Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[PEN-L:35883] Re: Re: Re: RE: G. William Domhoff replies...The
whole thing?
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Hoover:
What for? Professors are paid to do excellent research.
whatever gave you above idea?
I have
Title: RE: [PEN-L:35859] Re: RE: G. William Domhoff replies...The whole thing?
I think with the killing of people in Iraq, Palestine,
we don't need
to center on personalities.
That's what I was saying: petty attacks on Domhoff and the like are distractions (at best
Please, let's cool it. There are more important things going on now. Do
we really need circular firing squads?
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:09:10PM -0500, Louis Proyect wrote:
Doug Henwood wrote:
And who is centering on personalities? Now it's Domhoff, added to a long
list of ad hominems,
Let's everybody chill out. Louis' participation in this latest round has been constructive. We needn't have matters degenerate as they have at times. right now there's a war on. Can everyone here be nice to each other over things that don't matter? Louis has actually beeing trying to do that. As
Michael Hoover:
What for? Professors are paid to do excellent research.
whatever gave you above idea?
I have no idea. It just popped into my head like any other outrageous
thought. In any case, here's what a friend of mine, who teaches at a funky
NYC community college and who attended
Domhoff names names in the structure without conceptualizing it adequately.
It's a much more "American" way of going at the issue. At the other extreme,
people conceptualize the structure elaborately but do not name any names.
Though each has its advantages and disadvantages, a blend of both is
