Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-26 Thread Jim Devine
Barkley wrote: ... nobody should be under any illusions whatsoever. The Bush administration is turning out to be far far worse than anybody forecast and certainly far worse than a Gore administration would have been. And it will negatively impact many people in the rest of the world, I am

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-26 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- From: "Jim Devine" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 12:13 PM Subject: [PEN-L:9528] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Barkley wrote: ... nobody should be under any illusions whatsoever. The Bush administration is turning out to be far fa

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-26 Thread Jim Devine
At 12:45 PM 3/26/01 -0500, you wrote: They could overdo it. But, most people do not even know what they are doing. It is a successful stealth campaign so far. yeah, but I'm trying to intuit future trends. As for North Korea, they are probably right that the DPRK will not outright

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-26 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. At 12:45 PM 3/26/01 -0500, you wrote: They could overdo it. But, most people do not even know what they are doing. It is a successful stealth campaign so far. yeah, but I'm trying to intuit future trends. As for North Korea, they are prob

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-25 Thread Mark Laffey
What evidence is there that Nader voters were in fact potential Gore voters? That is, is there any data to show that had Nader not been an option, the people who voted for him would have voted for Gore? Surely that is the correct question to ask. Nader voters may simply have stayed at home

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-25 Thread Justin Schwartz
Hey, Mark, don't bother. The Demicans can't face up to the fact that they lost because they ran like Repugs, as well as running a generally sorry, suckass candidate who blew what should have been a sure thing, and they are deeply resentful because they think they own the votes of the left.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-25 Thread Brad DeLong
But the idea that the left cannot be taken for granted is profoundly frightening to Dems. And profoundly heart-gladdening for Republicans. The idea that we might be able to exercise real power is absolutely terrifying. If we are to put together a winning party, it means taking votes from

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-25 Thread Doug Henwood
Mark Laffey wrote: What evidence is there that Nader voters were in fact potential Gore voters? That is, is there any data to show that had Nader not been an option, the people who voted for him would have voted for Gore? Surely that is the correct question to ask. Nader voters may simply have

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-25 Thread Stephen E Philion
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Doug Henwood wrote: Mark Laffey wrote: What evidence is there that Nader voters were in fact potential Gore voters? That is, is there any data to show that had Nader not been an option, the people who voted for him would have voted for Gore? Surely that is the

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-25 Thread Ken Hanly
An economic decline is not just the foundation for non-left alternatives, it is also the potential foundaton for left alternatives. As long as capitalism is able to provide a degree of prosperity for a significant part of the working class there is almost no hope of a left alternative to the left

RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.

2001-03-24 Thread Lisa Ian Murray
Except that Dubya is opposed to ergonomic rules. Nader is supposed to like them--but he likes being a publicity hound more... Brad DeLong * Apologies, Michael. Brad, grow up. Your Ivy League edumakation is showing. Ian