Louis Proyect wrote:
> Well, at least Ernest was a revolutionary socialist, even if he hadn't give
> ecology the full attention it deserved. We need more people like him
> nowadays
Actually, the question I have been trying to somehow ask (I haven't got
it right yet) in this debate (both earlie
Rod:
>I know the history. I know the economic cost. But what is the programme. What
>are the concrete steps that you propose? Move the cows back into Central
Park?
You apparently didn't read the post on "Green Cuba", otherwise you wouldn't
ask such flippant questions.
>There are any number of st
Actually Lou. Although I have a good friend who works for Starbucks, I don't
drink coffee, and have never been in a Starbucks.
I know the history. I know the economic cost. But what is the programme. What
are the concrete steps that you propose? Move the cows back into Central Park?
There are an
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>what are you trying to prove with your insults Doug? are you implying
the
>>impossibility of a socialist agenda? who is fantasizing here?
>Ok, so you don't have any idea what changes are necessary in the
>actual structures of production and consumption. All that's r
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>I have found myself in agreement with Lou's recent post suggesting that
>>the roots of ecological crisis and overpopulation pressures lie in the
>>contradictions of capitalism, and that a socialist revolution is not
>>only necessary but also desirable if we are to hav
what are you trying to prove with your insults Doug? are you implying the
impossibility of a socialist agenda? who is fantasizing here? nobody is
suggesting a _blue print_ for the future, as far as I can tell. Marx did
not suggest either. Politics is a day to day struggle and what we can do
is t
