Michael Perelman wrote:
Lou is correct on several points. Brad typically supports neo-liberal
policies abroad and, at least to my mind, he is more often than not wrong.
Also, the 3 people he mentioned did leave in disgust about Brad's
behavior. I thought that it would have been healthier to
Dialogue requires a certain degree of courtesy that was often absent from
his posts.
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 02:22:32PM -0500, Doug Henwood wrote:
Michael Perelman wrote:
Lou is correct on several points. Brad typically supports neo-liberal
policies abroad and, at least to my mind, he is
Title: RE: [PEN-L:32724] Re: RE: Re: Maquiladoras not beneficial
I said:
It's
not the same as the self-perception and self-justification of
imperialists
that I described.
Ian writes:
Right, except that I think they're no longer worried about the fables of
international public goods
Doug Henwood wrote:
Michael Perelman wrote:
True enough, but it's an odd model of dialogue that will admit only
people in fundamental agreement with each other. I guess it's the
left version of Richard Feinberg's wonderful comment that democracy
only works when there's fundamental
Carrol Cox:
Brad is an enemy, but one can talk to him just as Chou tried to talk to
Dulles one morning during the Geneva Conference. (They both arrived
early one morning; Chou offered to shake hands, Dulles snubbed him.) In
the present case Lou is playing a marxist version of Dulles's style,
