Charles, if you don't stop your fight with Doug immediately -- I mean it
-- I will have to unsub you. I don't want to do it.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 08:08:02PM -0800, Charles Jannuzi wrote:
>
> --- Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Please calm down. Again. This has no place
> >
Please, we don't need antagonism here.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 07:21:30PM -0800, Charles Jannuzi wrote:
> >
> > Doug
>
> Since he won't come on the list, how the f-
> should I know? My guess is that neither the
> workers nor the state have any room for
> ill-informed, obscurantist hack autonomis
Chris Burford wrote:
At 13/11/02 14:34 -0500, you wrote:
The U.S. is under the control of a frightening gang of lunatics
hellbent on war with a good bit of the world. Why are Toni Negri
and The Nation magazine such urgent enemies?
Doug
Because sectarian traditions of marxism cannot engage wi
At 02:34 PM 11/13/2002 -0500, you wrote:
The U.S. is under the control of a frightening gang of lunatics hellbent
on war with a good bit of the world. Why are Toni Negri and The Nation
magazine such urgent enemies?
Doug
Who says they're enemies? I think Carrol and I are saying, in different
At 13/11/02 14:34 -0500, you wrote:
The U.S. is under the control of a frightening gang of lunatics hellbent
on war with a good bit of the world. Why are Toni Negri and The Nation
magazine such urgent enemies?
Doug
Because sectarian traditions of marxism cannot engage with the real world,
and
I am trying to wade through a load of e-mail today and just came upon
this. This is absolutely uncalled far. Please stop immediately.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:47:10PM -0500, Louis Proyect wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, Doug, but you will have to get used to me taking potshots at people
> you look up
Jim Devine:
It sure seems that we could also spend time on such things as the
principles of socialism (i.e., what are we really for, anyway?) but some
object to that. I recently received a series of off-list insults from one
who didn't want to discuss "socialism from below" (the socialist
phil
I don't think that they are THE ENEMY, but I am disappointed that they
have taken the path that they did. Negri's early stuff was very
impressive, but Italian friends say that the new book did not represent
much of a turn for him. Maybe I just did not understand the earlier work.
The Nation too
Title: RE: [PEN-L:32161] Re: Re: Re: Re: Negri explains the "multitude"
> From: Doug Henwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> The U.S. is under the control of a frightening gang of lunatics
> hellbent on war with a good bit of the world. Why are Toni Negri and
> The Natio
The U.S. is under the control of a frightening gang of lunatics hellbent
on war with a good bit of the world. Why are Toni Negri and The Nation
magazine such urgent enemies?
Doug
Sorry, Doug, but you will have to get used to me taking potshots at people
you look up to, whether it is Toni Neg
Doug Henwood wrote:
>
> The U.S. is under the control of a frightening gang of lunatics
> hellbent on war with a good bit of the world. Why are Toni Negri and
> The Nation magazine such urgent enemies?
>
They aren't -- but this is a maillist, not the political bureau of a
mass revolutionary pa
The U.S. is under the control of a frightening gang of lunatics
hellbent on war with a good bit of the world. Why are Toni Negri and
The Nation magazine such urgent enemies?
Doug
12 matches
Mail list logo
