From: Stephen Cullenberg
Doug
People might be interested to know that Jack Amariglio, David Ruccio and I
have a forthcoming edited volume from Routledge on the topic Doug mentions.
. . .
Steve let me say I appreciate your persistence, in the face
of all the abuse to which I have made my own
Stephen Cullenberg wrote:
While the book deals mainly with economics, folks might also be
interested in another event where many people broadly influenced by
postmodernism (and many who are not) will be coming together to
discuss and debate Marxism. The Marxism 2000 conference sponsored
by
Jim Devine wrote:
BTW, Doug, is this the comparison we want to make (pomotistas vs.
neoclassical econ.)? isn't there a third alternative, like reading
LBO?
Well of course. But I'm biased.
Carrol Cox wrote:
The economists are clearly of the enemy, and are recognized as such by
all on the
BUFFALOS? --jks
In a message dated Fri, 8 Sep 2000 2:45:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Carrol Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doug Henwood wrote:
Are "these people" any worse than most of the economics literature,
which is all too often obscure, abstract, remote from reality, and
Me, an economist? Sir, there is my gage! And having shown little interest in
philosophy? What would show a lot. pray tell, beyond gettimng a PhD in it and working
the field until the jobs ran out? --jks
In a message dated Fri, 8 Sep 2000 3:20:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Doug Henwood
[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BUFFALOS? --jks
http://ils.unc.edu/~lindgren/RedOrange/index.html,
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/4401/RCMain.html.
Doug
