Re: Re: Re: Re: Suppression of Marx

2002-03-05 Thread Waistline2
In a message dated 3/5/2002 6:14:29 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dear Melvin, before becoming a researcher, I was a worker and an Union leader, like you. And I believed in "historical materialism", too. I believed in it, because having not yet visited history by myself, I t

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: suppression

2002-02-21 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
>Rakesh Bhandari wrote: > >>Why is that when the question of oil economics came up, I seemed to >>be the only one who remembered Bina's work though Bina had been a >>co-editor (I believe) of RRPE with many of you? > >Hey, I had Bina on the radio. You're not the only one. > >Doug Doug, this was

RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: suppression

2002-02-20 Thread Devine, James
> Cyrus [Bina] is supposed to be on pen-l. I do remember him very well from my > days on the ed. board. he's a good guy, too. Jim Devine

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: suppression

2002-02-20 Thread Michael Perelman
Cyrus is supposed to be on pen-l. I do remember him very well from my days on the ed. board. Doug Henwood wrote: > Rakesh Bhandari wrote: > > >Why is that when the question of oil economics came up, I seemed to > >be the only one who remembered Bina's work though Bina had been a > >co-editor (I

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: suppression

2002-02-20 Thread Doug Henwood
Rakesh Bhandari wrote: >Have you ever explained why Henwood was never able to get himself >both to understand why most third world trade unionists oppose the >linkage between trade and labor rights and to recognize that to many >the US union backed anti sweatshop movements is probably a move i

Re: Re: Re: Re: suppression

2002-02-20 Thread Doug Henwood
Rakesh Bhandari wrote: >Why is that when the question of oil economics came up, I seemed to >be the only one who remembered Bina's work though Bina had been a >co-editor (I believe) of RRPE with many of you? Hey, I had Bina on the radio. You're not the only one. Doug

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: suppression

2002-02-17 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
>Rakesh, you have recounted in your post maybe half a dozen arguments that >have made you feel aggrieved. I suspect nobody else matches that record. So I must be the source of the problem? And if so, how? Did you or did you not chastise Phillips for a totally unjustified attack on me? Did yo

Re: Re: Re: Re: suppression

2002-02-17 Thread Michael Perelman
Rakesh, you have recounted in your post maybe half a dozen arguments that have made you feel aggrieved. I suspect nobody else matches that record. I don't have any problem at all with your ideas. I just don't think that personal arguments have any business here. On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 01:56:3