Rush Limbaugh, the dean of rightwing talk radio, was forced to resign as
football commentator for the ESPN cable sports station (he actually got
his start in broadcasting in sports) after stating on a pre-game show
last Sunday:
I think what we've had here is a little social concern in the NFL
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The other day I was reading an interesting commentary on George W. Bush,
where unfortunately I cannot remember. It stated that he has been
underestimated by the left and is capable of a wolverine-like intelligence
when it comes to the imperial interests of
Carl Remick wrote:
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The other day I was reading an interesting commentary on George W. Bush,
where unfortunately I cannot remember. It stated that he has been
underestimated by the left and is capable of a wolverine-like intelligence
when it comes to
Carrol writes:
I've several times on different lists raised an eyebrow as it were re
the focus on GWB's intelligence. I still remember vividly how fooled
everyone was in Eisenhower's administration by his genius at mimicking
stupidity. I think leftists should simply stay away from estimating
every once and awhile, MS Outlook sends my e-mail before I'm finished
(because I hit control-enter by mistake). Here's my finished message.
Carrol writes:
I've several times on different lists raised an eyebrow as it were re
the focus on GWB's intelligence. I still remember vividly how fooled
Devine, James wrote:
Carrol writes:
I've several times on different lists raised an eyebrow as it were re
the focus on GWB's intelligence. I still remember vividly how fooled
everyone was in Eisenhower's administration by his genius at mimicking
stupidity. I think leftists should simply stay
On Thursday, October 2, 2003 at 16:13:28 (-0400) Doug Henwood writes:
...
Oh come on. What's wrong with a little ad hominem, especially with
such a gang of thugs? Here's a guy with every advantage in life
handed to him - Andover, Yale, Harvard, inherited money and position
- and he's still a
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] Rush Limbaugh
On Thursday, October 2, 2003 at 16:13:28 (-0400) Doug Henwood writes:
...
Oh come on. What's wrong with a little ad hominem, especially with
such a gang of thugs? Here's a guy with every advantage in life
handed to him - Andover, Yale, Harvard
]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] Rush Limbaugh
On Thursday, October 2, 2003 at 16:13:28 (-0400)
Doug Henwood writes:
...
Oh come on. What's wrong with a little ad
hominem, especially with
such a gang of thugs? Here's a guy
On Thursday, October 2, 2003 at 13:31:29 (-0700) Devine, James writes:
In this case, the _ad hominem_ is quite relevant. If you want to
understand the Bush team, the fact that it's centered on someone whose
had every advantage in life handed to him - Andover, Yale, Harvard,
inherited money and
I wrote:
In this case, the _ad hominem_ is quite relevant. If you want to
understand the Bush team, the fact that it's centered on
someone whose
had every advantage in life handed to him - Andover, Yale, Harvard,
inherited money and position - and he's still a provincial ignoramus
says
Limbaugh's cousin was a deputy sherrif here in Butte County. Here is a
clop from Tim's defunct paper:
LIMBAUGH, you'll recall, is the cousin of talk radio blowhard Rush
Limbaugh, and retired from the Butte County Sheriff's Department
last summer amid allegations that he was involved
Doug Henwood wrote:
Oh come on. What's wrong with a little ad hominem, especially with
such a gang of thugs? Here's a guy with every advantage in life
handed to him - Andover, Yale, Harvard, inherited money and position
- and he's still a provincial ignoramus. Marx never had any problem
From the perspective of the working class and other dominated groups,
it's likely true that The crimes of the Bush administration aren't substantially
different than those of the Great Liberal Humanitarian, Jimmy Carter (It's hard
to make these kinds of comparisons, though.)
But in terms
Dear MP,
An excellent observation bringing together two otherwise separate phenomena.
Thanks!
I left this off my earlier message by accident.
I always enjoyed the section of Marx on the working day and where he
describes the gathering of small pieces of time in order to get more
work out of
I left this off my earlier message by accident.
I always enjoyed the section of Marx on the working day and where he
describes the gathering of small pieces of time in order to get more
work out of the employees. This piece in the New York Times describes
how radio stations get rid of the
16 matches
Mail list logo
