Yoshie:
Lou says there are merely a few sentences on slavery in Wood's book
on the origins of capitalism. There usually is _zero_ sentence on
gender in a serious Marxist scholar's serious discussion (clip)
LP: This is a bogus argument.
Why so? While I don't agree with Maria Mies (who
By the way, does anyone know of some interesting reading stuff
explaining why didn't Brazil generate its own "breeding states" while
the USA did?
A hug,
Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Lou:
Yoshie:
Lou says there are merely a few sentences on slavery in Wood's book
on the origins of capitalism. There usually is _zero_ sentence on
gender in a serious Marxist scholar's serious discussion (clip)
LP: This is a bogus argument.
Why so? While I don't agree with Maria Mies
Once again I'm mystified by this thread. This time, I don't
understand why (allegedly) overlooking slavery is an intellectual
crime, but complaining about the absence of gender is "bogus."
Mr Grouchy, ABD
===
LP: This is not about overlooking. As I have already stated
on three different
Louis Proyect said on 10/28/00 12:42 PM
LP: This is not about overlooking. As I have already stated
on three different occasions, the problem is how slavery
is viewed theoretically. Brenner and Wood break with the
Eric Williams analysis. The paucity of references to slavery
in her book is not
Martin Schiller:
What about in non-capitalist cultures? Like huntergather intertribal
warfare where slaves are taken? Do you define slavery by (the name of)
the culture that contains that activity? Or is slavery a continuous
evolving thread of human activity that deserves consideration in that
I really don't understand the point of all this. Is Ellen Wood an
insufficient enemy of capitalism because her book doesn't meet some
sort of content quota? How does all this really matter? Maybe it
does; I'm all ears.
Doug
Another thing that bothers me is that _neither Wood, nor Brenner,
Yoshie:
Lou says there are merely a few sentences on slavery in Wood's book on the origins of
capitalism. There usually is _zero_ sentence on gender in a serious Marxist scholar's
serious discussion (clip)
LP: This is a bogus argument. We are not dealing with neglect or inattention. We are
Yoshie:
Lou says there are merely a few sentences on slavery in Wood's book
on the origins of capitalism. There usually is _zero_ sentence on
gender in a serious Marxist scholar's serious discussion (clip)
LP: This is a bogus argument.
Why so? While I don't agree with Maria Mies (who
Yoshie:
Lou says there are merely a few sentences on slavery in Wood's book
on the origins of capitalism. There usually is _zero_ sentence on
gender in a serious Marxist scholar's serious discussion (clip)
LP: This is a bogus argument.
Why so? While I don't agree with Maria Mies (who
10 matches
Mail list logo
