Demographers have been meeting at the United Nations this week to
contemplate and confirm the evidence that women in their hundreds of
millions in the developing countries, perhaps their billions, are
apparently taking decisions to have smaller families.
In a reminder that economics
In a message dated 3/15/2002 4:00:04 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Comrade melvin
Thank you your reply
I propose some question on your argument.
1. I suggest that you grasp capitalist society as firstly relation between
buying and selling labor power and secondly surplus
Europe's strong trade unions are opposed to any restrictions on
the cradle-to-grave government cushion. That was the key point of
50,000 union members who took part in the peaceful march. We
don't want the American model, said Tony Young, president of the
Trades Union Congress, Britain's
HindustanTimes.com
Friday, March 15, 2002
India-Iran-Russia to bulid new Asia transport bridge
Fred Weir
(Moscow, March 14)
A new India-Iran-Russia transport corridor will be the most important bridge
between Europe and Asia since the Suez Canal and the Trans-Siberian Railway,
say Russian
Why the Rich Get Richer
Exotic and complicated investments, unavailable to the rest of us,
help explain . . .
By Ben White
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, March 17, 2002; Page H01
Value chain arbitrage. Pair trades. Seagulls. Restructuring plays.
Forget hedge funds. These are the true
At 17/03/02 10:41 -0800, you wrote:
Europe's strong trade unions are opposed to any restrictions on
the cradle-to-grave government cushion. That was the key point of
50,000 union members who took part in the peaceful march. We
don't want the American model, said Tony Young, president of the
At 3/17/2002, you wrote:
I thought that the total size of the demonstration was more like 100,000.
That is very welcome considering how mass demonstrations have fallen away
in the USA.
Lef of center press here (Argentina) reported that 250,000 protesters
marched through Barcelona
Alan
the article simply singled out the 50,000 *trade unionists*. Other
guesstimates put the total at out 100k or moreOnce again it
looks like the cops opened fire
Ian
- Original Message -
From: Alan Cibils [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 17,
http://www.fortune.com/indexw.jhtml?channel=artcol.jhtmldoc_id=206684page=1_DARGS=%2Fartcol.jhtml.3_A_DAV=artcol.jhtml
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 3/17/2002, you wrote:
I thought that the total size of the demonstration was more like
100,000. That is very welcome considering how mass demonstrations
have fallen away in the USA.
Lef of center press here (Argentina) reported that 250,000
protesters marched through Barcelona
Alan
I have not really read much material on the Carlyle Group (or been very
interested in it), but reading the Fortune piece it seems to me here is
an instance where LOV as a _sociological_ rather than (merely) economic
concept is useful. It looks like all they do is redistribute surplus
value. And
Yes, your appraisal is correct. Of course, redistribution of the surplus
via government spending has led to a multitude of interpretations.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 08:05:16PM -0600, Carrol Cox wrote:
I have not really read much material on the Carlyle Group (or been very
interested in it),
[Financial Times]
Enron failure boosts Latin America
By Richard Lapper
Published: March 17 2002 18:41 | Last Updated: March 17 2002 22:32
When policymakers studied the impact of last year's two big
financial disasters, Latin America seemed more vulnerable to the
impact of debt default and
This article is like A.G. Frank's analysis of Latin America prospering
during the Depression.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What interests me about Carlyle Group is, in a way, still rather amorphous.
1. They give revolving doors an entirely new 'spin'.
At first the strategy was how to benefit from the consolidation of the
defense industries of the US and UK that took place from the late 1980s
onward. No one took
Perhaps you'll try value chain arbitrage. How does it work?
Simple. Take a sector -- say, telecommunications. At the top of
the chain are carriers. Beneath them are the suppliers, such as
optical-network equipment maker JDS Uniphase, which depend on the
carriers for revenue. If you think a
Charles Jannuzi wrote:
Perhaps you'll try value chain arbitrage. How does it work?
I really wish posters would indicate who they were quoting. Can _anyone_
read all or even most of the posts that they download each day? I can't
and won't. And as a result I sometimes can't follow a thread at
While CG's funds cherry pick profitable holdings and clients, it does
another important type of cherry picking: head hunting through the revolving
doors of DC and other government centers. It's got the former head of the
World Bank, the former head of the FCC, and the former head of the SEC. I'm
And if CG enters an area, you can be sure (1) the stakes are high, (2)
they've got key insider knowledge, and (3) they know who to lobby (imagine
being lobbied by your former boss with a promise of a job at a company like
CG!). Anyway, it was Kennard, now at CG, when he was in charge of the FCC,
Carrol wrote:
. Can _anyone_
read all or even most of the posts that they download each day? I can't
and won't. And as a result I sometimes can't follow a thread at all
unless the posters identify who they are quoting.
Carrol
I quoted the Washington Post article that Ian posted. Yes, I
I am not sure that we should side with Nextwave. They overbid and went
bust. Why give the creditors a free ride? Why not resell the spectrum to
a new set of vultures? Although if the funds just finance more war, then
...
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
The poor fellow already has an impossible last
name to pronounce for English speakers: Öncü.
Why don't you give it a try?
Oncyurr? Enchway? Ownkwer? gimme some help here
in return I'm prepared to give a few tips on
Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyndrobwllantisliogogogoch :)
dd
MP writes:
I am not sure that we should side with Nextwave. They overbid and went
bust. Why give the creditors a free ride? Why not resell the spectrum to
a new set of vultures? Although if the funds just finance more war, then
The biggest creditor is the federal government here, since
From the Post article, which doesn't name names (of course):
Or you could steer some of your capital into restructuring plays.
All you have to do is know what sleeping giant is likely to
respond well to a dash of fresh capital, stronger management or
some other medicine.
Now see how it
24 matches
Mail list logo
