We picked up our daughter yesterday. I am just now of wading through a
ton of e-mail.
The tone of this thread is pretty bad. Too much noise relative to the
signal. It's too late to point fingers at its origins.
So for now let us just stop it. No more recriminations.
Canada is bad. Nader
We picked up our daughter yesterday. I am just now of wading through a
ton of e-mail.
The tone of this thread is pretty bad. Too much noise relative to the
signal. It's too late to point fingers at its origins.
So for now let us just stop it. No more recriminations.
Canada is bad. Nader
Brad, that 3 percent of the vote was enough to sink the Gore campaign is a
sad commentary on what the Democrats had to offer. With regard to voting for
Nader at no cost to Gore, Nader voters in California certainly had no effect
and knew it before hand.
With regard to the dimes worth of
Brad, that 3 percent of the vote was enough to sink the Gore campaign is a sad
commentary on what the Democrats had to offer. With regard to voting for Nader at no
cost
to Gore, Nader voters in California certainly had no effect and knew it before hand.
right! It's like those Democrats who
Given that Brad has a cogent critique that he is willing to explain and
unpack in response to challenges, this is yet another abuse of
moderating authority. I have no idea what this list is for any more,
save idle chat among the like-minded. Every time a discussion gets into
any critical depth,
I agree that Brad has a cogent critique. The problem is that he has
repeated it any number of times. I myself just made the mistake of
responding. I was wrong.
I don't mind disagreement all. I probably don't agree with one percent of
what David S. believes, except -- from what I infer from
