Louis Proyect wrote:
There are 2 ways at looking at the
question of TINA (There is no
alternative.) First, you can accept
the objective conditions and not go
off on an ultraleft binge like the
sectarian Marxist-Leninist groups
for whom it is always 1917. We
don't want to go there.
Carl Dassbach wrote:
More importantly, he is a politician and politicians,
because the deal in compromise and consensus,
can never be trusted.
But I would rather trust Obama than a coward who writes insulting
anonymous e-mails to other list members.
Julio Huato wrote:
But, is that all? Avoiding sectarian Marxism-Leninism and
denouncing Obama as a Rockefeller Republican is what's required to
advance Marxist (TM) socialism in the U.S.?
More or less.
___
pen-l mailing list
