Michael Perelman wrote:
I agree with Melvyn that a real Democratic party would be fighting for progressive
causes, but the existing one wants to win over the people and the big donors at the
same time. It can't be done.
The concept of a Real Democratic Party exists only in the daydreams of
Thanks, Paul. This is very helpful. The only empirical
study of behavior and health costs that I am aware of
is from a real-life experiment in which a Fortune 500
firm substantially increased co-pays for drugs and found
that people with chronic conditions high cholesterol,
blood pressure,
The best person in the entire U.S. on U.S. elections is Greg Palast (*Best
Democracy Money can Buy*), cited for example by Paul Krugman of the *New
York Times* before this current election. Here is Palast's statement this
morning:
http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=391row=0
KERRY WON.
Sam Smith writes: Placated by Prozac
In my understanding,
Prozac and similar Saris don't placate. Instead, they allow people
to more effectively deal with the personal reasons why theyre depressed,
especially in conjunction with talk therapy. (Thats not to deny the
side-effects or the
Oops. My clicking the wrong button on my spell-checker
changed SSRIs to Saris!
JimDevine, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; web: http://myweb.lmu.edu/jdevine/
From: Devine, James
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004
8:07 AM
To: 'PEN-L
list'
Subject: RE: [PEN-L] Sam Smith on
bad
In a previous message, I cited Robert (not Wilhelm) Reichs
view that the Dems or the anti-Bush people in general[*] should
embrace moral argument (as opposed to policy-speak) and Michael Perelman
agreed. We must be conscious that this involves moral conflict (and not just class
Reich is correct. Unemployment job insecurity destroys families. Poverty
hurts
the fetuses that the fundies want brought into the world.
^
CB: Isn't Roe v Wade in jeopardy now ?
Many of the voters are not extremists, but the Dems. give them the idea that
they
don't care about their
At 11:46 04/11/2004, Carl wrote:
From:
Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GETTING THROUGH THE BAD TIMES
by Sam Smith
SNIP
GWB's mandate-driven second term will
be exceptionally unpleasant for
progressives in the U.S., but there's no
question that the mass of Americans will be in the mood for
Excellent point!
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:58:53PM -0400, michael a. lebowitz wrote:
At 11:46 04/11/2004, Carl wrote:
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GETTING THROUGH THE BAD TIMES
by Sam Smith
SNIP
GWB's mandate-driven second term will
be exceptionally unpleasant for
Counterpunch, November 4, 2004
The Self-Fulfilling Prophesy of Lesser Evilism
A Right-Wing Republic?
By SHARON SMITH
George Bush barely defeated John Kerry in the Electoral College, but he
won the popular vote by a sizeable margin of 4 million across the
country. Republicans increased their
Let's drop the Nader thing. The Dems ran a poor campaign. Let's hear what we can do
better, but rehashing Nader serves no good purpose.
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:16:24PM -0500, Louis Proyect wrote:
Counterpunch, November 4, 2004
The Self-Fulfilling Prophesy of Lesser Evilism
A Right-Wing
Carrol Cox wrote:
This raises many questions to debate, but at some point leftists have to
realize that the DP is their enemy, that it exists to absorb and blunt
actual political activity.
If such a thing existed, I might agree with you. But it's not 1968 anymore.
Doug
On Nov 4, 2004, at 6:07 AM, Louis Proyect wrote:
From Kerry's concession speech
...I pledge to do my part to try to bridge the partisan divide.
I know this is a difficult time for my supporters, but I ask them, all
of you, to join me in doing that. Now, more than ever, with our
soldiers
in harm's
- Original Message -
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a previous message, I cited Robert (not Wilhelm) Reich's view that
the Dems - or the anti-Bush people in general[*] - should embrace moral
argument (as opposed to policy-speak) and Michael Perelman agreed. We
must be conscious
I think I've read more messages from Michael not to talk about Nader than I
myself have written about Nader.
Michael, you'll have more success, in your own terms, if you just stop
trying to limit the discussion (e.g., I wouldn't have posted this).
Turning to the larger question:
I, for one, expect
Exactly, we should be figuring out how to approach the future. Here, I am with you
all the
way.
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 01:27:26PM -0500, Paul Zarembka wrote:
I, for one, expect a big crashing in of this fossil-fuel economy, beginning
soon (I'm not prescient enough to know when). What
On Nov 4, 2004, at 10:08 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:
Carrol Cox wrote:
This raises many questions to debate, but at some point leftists have
to
realize that the DP is their enemy, that it exists to absorb and blunt
actual political activity.
If such a thing existed, I might agree with you. But it's
Ian writes:My guess is that what we need is a
reframing of moral argument that massively shifts the justificatory burden onto
the Right:
What is the justification for homophobia?...
The goal of such simple questions could be directed at
pointing out just how much capriciousness,
The horror of the Civil War made people more skeptical about
fanaticism. At least, that is the message of Menand, Louis. 2001. The
Metaphysical Club (NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux). Supposedly, this
change of mind helped to push one group of people toward progressivism
and a more rational
Dear Anybody But Bush Liberal Democrats
... Let's face the facts. Our country has serious problems. The world
is not doing very well. We need every source of energy inside the
electoral arena to turn harmful, costly and cruel trends against
billions of innocent people into just and healthy
http://www.blackcommentator.com/112/112_cover_election.html
Better analysis of the elction. I simply don't accept the implication made
by a number of left people on this list that Black voters are dumb, duped,
cowardly, reactionary, don't know what's best for them, etc.
Joel Wendland
Election Night Remarks from Campaign Manager Theresa Amato
I am the campaign manager of Nader/Camejo 2004, but I am also a worker,
taxpayer, citizen, and voter in the last colonial capital of the free
world, known as Washington, DC, where voters do not have the same
rights to statehood and
(An interesting commentary from Ruy Teixeira, despite the foolishness of
his repeated prediction that Kerry would win--a notion obviously related
to his off the wall theory that the Democrats are an emerging
majority. Although he correctly identifies the contradictions of the
Democratic Party,
There's something kind of familiar about this map.
http://www.learner.org/biographyofamerica/prog10/maps/
There sure is.
I've commented before that I wish the northern states would finish the
Civil War.
Ken.
I see you won Ohio that time :-)
-Original Message-
From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Scanlan
Sent: 04 November 2004 21:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: something familiar
There's something kind of familiar about this map.
there really isn't anything similar. The Rocky Mountain states and a large part of the
Midwest that went with the South.
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://myweb.lmu.edu/jdevine
From: PEN-L list on behalf of Kenneth Campbell
Sent: Thu 11/4/2004 1:17 PM
To:
Jim writes:
there really isn't anything similar. The Rocky Mountain
states and a large part of the Midwest that went with
the South.
Could you clarify that? There may be a word extra in there.
Ken.
Carl writes:
Since the south has a long tradition of militarism that
the north lacks -- not to mention possession of the vast
majority of military bases -- I don't think this would
have quite the outcome you envision.
I do not envision anything.
The south is the repository of military bases
wheels will be dropping off within two years, not just four.
I think there will be a price for the support from the rest of the
world.
I mean it's not just about the time frame, it's about somehow some
changes in the nature of politics that hopefully are more fundamental
than which president is in
look at this front page: http://www.mirror.co.uk/frontpages/
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://myweb.lmu.edu/jdevine
But, did not Dan's original map that started this thread show that the
Rockies and related territories were slave-friendly but not
slave-positive? Thought it was historically interesting.
Ken.
in the map of the red (Bush) states, it's not just the South,
but also the Rocky Mountain states and a
right. but Oregon territory was larger at the time than present-day Oregon, whereas
the entire Midwest was blue (anti-slavery) back then.
In addition, it's important to see the reaction as more than just a bunch of (white)
Southerners. there's also a lot of government-subsidized individualism
Ahh, Jim... you know I agree with you. Nothing is one-dimensional.
I was just having fun with Vera Cruz and all in the midst of this
leftist despair.
Blame it on Dan's damn map.
Respectfully,
Ken.
33 matches
Mail list logo