Brad DeLong wrote:
On the one hand, trees and hills. On the other hand, people. On what
theory of political justice can the first ever trump the second?
Well, Senator Albert Beveridge seemed to have a fairly firm grasp of one
such. I guess it depends on which people you are addressing.
For what they are worth, my views on the Malvinas are very simple. Geography
alone would suggest that they are a part of Argentina, and I would recognise
Argentinian sovereignty.
Michael K.
On the one hand, trees and hills. On the other hand, people. On what
theory of political justice can the
If, as Tam Dalyell has shown, Thatcher prepared the war in order to
win her elections...
How did Thatcher do that? Did she bribe the Junta to send troops to
the Malvinas Islands?
Brad DeLong
The population in
the Malvinas are the result of forcible eviction, by a British fleet,
of the legal
The debate on the Falklands/Malvinas is troubling. I thought the the outcome
meant that Thatcher triumphed politically, while the junta had to face political
defeat, eventually.
As to rights, such matters are troubling. I live on property stolen from the
Mexicans who stole it from the Native
