Re: [Pen-l] comment at conference

2008-10-24 Thread Julio Huato
I haven't been able to follow closely the way in which the rest of the world has been dealing with the ongoing economic crisis. I imagine that in the moves in progress one could pre-figure the type of re-structuring of global capitalism most likely to happen. On Oct. 12, while the thoughts of the

Re: [Pen-l] comment at conference

2008-10-12 Thread michael a. lebowitz
On 11/10/2008 8:13 PM, Jim Devine wrote: michael a. lebowitz wrote: ... there seems to be some concern about a barbaric version of your first process.both samir today and the minister of economy of Ecuador yesterday warned about what the latter called the real possibility of neo-Nazism -- pr

Re: [Pen-l] comment at conference

2008-10-11 Thread Jim Devine
michael a. lebowitz wrote: > ... there seems to be some concern about a barbaric version > of your first process.both samir today and the minister of economy of > Ecuador yesterday warned about what the latter called the real possibility > of neo-Nazism -- precisely because the world oligarchy is

Re: [Pen-l] comment at conference

2008-10-10 Thread michael a. lebowitz
On 10/10/2008 5:23 PM, Patrick Bond wrote: But while we are all rather triumphalist about 'neoliberalism is dead' (as nearly everyone seems to be), two other processes look likely to now play out: a) new waves of austerity visiting on working peoples plus eco-destruction in a frantic search

Re: [Pen-l] comment at conference

2008-10-10 Thread Patrick Bond
michael a. lebowitz wrote: ... I think the distinction that we have to make is to recognize that there are two paths. The first is a capitalist path, the restructuring of capitalism. The second is a socialist path, one which creates conditions for building socialism; and one of the most signif