On 13/07/14 19:50, Ricardo Signes wrote:
> * Matijs van Zuijlen [2014-07-13T07:17:39]
>> - Email::Sender is more dangerous: if through a programming error an
>> undefined transport is passed to sendmail(), it will happily try to send the
>> mail you were trying to save locally via SMTP.
> Don't us
* Matijs van Zuijlen [2014-07-13T07:17:39]
> - Email::Sender is more dangerous: if through a programming error an
> undefined transport is passed to sendmail(), it will happily try to send the
> mail you were trying to save locally via SMTP.
Don't use Email::Sender::Simple, use the Mbox (or whate
On 07/07/14 03:49, Ricardo Signes wrote:
> * Geoffrey Leach [2014-07-05T18:30:19]
>> I'm at work on MH.pm, which I hope to submit to CPAN as
>> Email::LocalDelivery:MH.pm. The code is based on
>> Email::LocalDelivery::Maildir.pm
>>
>> Question, in such a case is there a preference for maintaining
* Geoffrey Leach [2014-07-05T18:30:19]
> I'm at work on MH.pm, which I hope to submit to CPAN as
> Email::LocalDelivery:MH.pm. The code is based on
> Email::LocalDelivery::Maildir.pm
>
> Question, in such a case is there a preference for maintaining the format,
> naming conventions, etc. of the
I'm at work on MH.pm, which I hope to submit to CPAN as
Email::LocalDelivery:MH.pm. The code is based on
Email::LocalDelivery::Maildir.pm
Question, in such a case is there a preference for maintaining the format,
naming conventions, etc. of the original code?