Hi Will,
Sorry for the late response. ‘Us', ideally, would be myself, Anthony and Heike.
That way any of us can test on Power10.
Concerning suggestions on CAT, I have limited knowledge of the tool. Anthony
can probably provide better guidance in this case.
Best,
Giuseppe
> On 9 Aug 2022, at
On Tue, 2022-08-09 at 08:08 +0200, Giuseppe Congiu wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> We would need to verify your power10 presets before we add them to
> PAPI. We have a test suite that we normally use to do that (the
> counter analysis toolkit - CAT). Unfortunately, we don’t have access
> to any power10 mach
Hi Will,
We would need to verify your power10 presets before we add them to PAPI. We
have a test suite that we normally use to do that (the counter analysis toolkit
- CAT). Unfortunately, we don’t have access to any power10 machines at the
moment. Would it be possible for us to run the counter
On Wed, 2022-08-03 at 21:29 +0200, Giuseppe Congiu wrote:
> Hi will,
>
> How did you define the PAPI preset?
>
Meaning how did I come up with the values used? :-)
Typically I start
with the values for the previous processor,
and depending on the changes to the current Power PMU event list,
do my
Hi will,
How did you define the PAPI preset?
—Giuseppe
> On 3 Aug 2022, at 20:51, will schmidt wrote:
>
> [PATCH] PAPI, Power10 event list mappings.
>
> Hi,
> This patch provides the PAPI event
> mappings for Power10 support.
>
> This should be safe to commit once PAPI completes
> the pull
[PATCH] PAPI, Power10 event list mappings.
Hi,
This patch provides the PAPI event
mappings for Power10 support.
This should be safe to commit once PAPI completes
the pull requests from libpfm4 that will include
the prerequisite Power10 content.
diff --git a/src/papi_events.csv b/src/papi_
