Hi Stephane,
Forgive me if I understood wrongly but if I run the
example_v2.x/notify_self example on
my suse11 Nehalem system I get this:
./notify_self
[FIXED_CTRL(pmc16)=0xaa pmi0=1 en0=0x2 any0=0 pmi1=1 en1=0x2 any1=0
pmi2=1 en2=0x0 any2=0] INSTRUCTIONS_RETIRED UNHALTED_CORE_CYCLES
[FIXED
Daniel,
I assume you have changed busyloop() or reset notification_received,
otherwise the function will return immediately because notification_received
will already be 3.
void
busyloop(void)
{
/*
* busy loop to burn CPU cycles
*/
for(;notification_received <
We're looking for a little quick guidance.
We've got a brand new (arrived yesterday) dual Nelalem (Gainestown)
blade and are trying to bring up perfmon 2 or 3 on it.
The initial attempt was to build as a module. We used the released
/sys/kernel/perfmon/version 2.82. We're running libpfm-3.8 with
Hello Rob,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Rob Fowler wrote:
> We're looking for a little quick guidance.
>
> We've got a brand new (arrived yesterday) dual Nelalem (Gainestown)
> blade and are trying to bring up perfmon 2 or 3 on it.
>
> The initial attempt was to build as a module. We used the
Greetings, perfmon2 list.
I just compiled a Linux 2.6.28.1 kernel after applying the
perfmon-new-base-090219 patch. I'm using a free rebuild of RHEL 5.3.
I compiled the kernel with 'make rpm' and then installed the new kernel
on a couple of machines. I compiled/installed both libpfm-3.8 and
pfmo
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
> Greetings, perfmon2 list.
>
> I just compiled a Linux 2.6.28.1 kernel after applying the
> perfmon-new-base-090219 patch. I'm using a free rebuild of RHEL 5.3.
>
> I compiled the kernel with 'make rpm' and then installed the new kerne
