[perfmon2] intel westmere support

2010-02-11 Thread stephane eranian
Hi, I have updated the libpfm4 GIT tree with support for the upcoming Intel Westmere processor (model 37, 44) as documented in Vol 3b Dec 2009. The update includes both core and uncore PMU, though, only core PMU is supported by perf_events. Perf_events Westmere support is not yet available in 2.

Re: [perfmon2] Perf_events support for Nehalem uncore events.

2010-02-11 Thread stephane eranian
Gary, On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:51 PM, wrote: > Hi Stephane > > Do you happen to know if perf_events has any plans to support Nehalem > uncore events ?? > Well, I don't know if anyone is working on this. But this is definitively on my list of things to add. I don't like regressions! As you may

[perfmon2] Perf_events support for Nehalem uncore events.

2010-02-11 Thread Gary . Mohr
Hi Stephane Do you happen to know if perf_events has any plans to support Nehalem uncore events ?? There are several events in this set that we view as being very important when trying to determine how memory is being accessed and what the impact of memory access is on an applications performance

Re: [perfmon2] Perf_events support for Nehalem uncore events.

2010-02-11 Thread Corey Ashford
Hi Stephane, On 2/11/2010 1:00 PM, stephane eranian wrote: > Gary, > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:51 PM, wrote: >> Hi Stephane >> >> Do you happen to know if perf_events has any plans to support Nehalem >> uncore events ?? >> > Well, I don't know if anyone is working on this. But this is definitiv

Re: [perfmon2] Perf_events support for Nehalem uncore events.

2010-02-11 Thread stephane eranian
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Corey Ashford wrote: > Hi Stephane, > > On 2/11/2010 1:00 PM, stephane eranian wrote: >> >> Gary, >> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:51 PM,  wrote: >>> >>> Hi Stephane >>> >>> Do you happen to know if perf_events has any plans to support Nehalem >>> uncore events ??

Re: [perfmon2] [RFC] perf_events: how to add Intel LBR support

2010-02-11 Thread Robert Richter
On 10.02.10 17:01:45, Stephane Eranian wrote: > I was referring to the fact that if I enable LBR via a PERF_SAMPLE_* bit, I > will actually need more than one bit because there are configuration options. > I was not talking about event_attr.config. I am not sure how big a LBR sample would be, but

Re: [perfmon2] Perf_events support for Nehalem uncore events.

2010-02-11 Thread Corey Ashford
On 2/11/2010 2:19 PM, stephane eranian wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Corey Ashford > wrote: >> Hi Stephane, >> >> On 2/11/2010 1:00 PM, stephane eranian wrote: >>> >>> Gary, >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:51 PM,wrote: Hi Stephane Do you happen to know if pe