to me. I'd like to thank Bek for running
the list so far, and hope she'll be able to enjoy and participate in the
discussions in the future.
Simon Cozens
--
int three = 128+64, two = 128, one=64;
- plan9 has a bad day
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:50:26PM +0100, Lee Goddard wrote:
> Is anyone got any output from music composition scripts they'd be happy to
> share? Definitely not source code, just MIDI/mp3 files?
http://sound-hack.org/
--
SM is fun. ADSM is not.
"Safe, Sane, Consensual"... three words that ca
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 11:49:22AM -0400, William Thompson wrote:
> While I hesitate to step into what seems like a religious war
I'm the list admin, so I guess it's my job to step into a religious war. :)
Guys, can we move the advocacy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] where it belongs? If
what you're posti
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 10:25:43AM -0500, Jordan Dimov wrote:
> Is anyone here familiar with the concept of supercompilation, as
> described by prof. Valentin Turchin in [1] for example?
> [1] ``The Concept of a Supercompiler'', Valenting F. Turchin, ACM Trans.
> Program. Lang. Syst. 8, 3 (J
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 07:05:07PM -, Pete Sergeant wrote:
> What I want to know, is do any algorithms or similar exist for
> splitting a piece of somewhat formatted text into smaller chunks?
Yes. Us scary linguist types tend to call them "paragraphs".
--
I would imagine most of the reader
*cough*
So, anyone actually want to talk about AI? You've gone past advocacy, that's
the previous door on the right.
--
Everything that can ever be invented has been invented
- Charles H. Duell, Commisioner of U.S. Patents, 1899.
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 06:39:14PM -0500, Joe Schulman wrote:
> I have no problem with it and find it extremely interesting.
Although I have supreme doubts that this will work, and I also
believe that more effort should be spent on the *real* next
implementation of the Perl interpreter, Perl 6, t
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 08:52:34AM -0400, Josiah Bryan wrote:
> However, I would be quite interested in hearing
> details and specific examples of ways to implement
> this dream as a reality.
I don't think we should go this way either, sorry; if you
want to try and pin the supercompilation guy
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 07:15:56AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, part of the problem is the terminology. AI is dead.
Shit. Guess we'll have to close the list down. :)
> The terms today are "Information theory" and "Machine learning."
And "information retrieval". See some of Dan Bria
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 02:27:14PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Interesting coincidence. I've just been working on a perl version of
> "life" myself.
Very nice. You wait until you see SelfGOL, though.
Simon
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:04:29PM -0500, John Douglas Porter wrote:
> Nathan Torkington wrote:
> > http://norvig.com/python/python.html
>
> Ooh. I am incensed.
> Or I should say, I *was* incensed.
> Now I just think the guy's being foolish, for using Python rather than Java.
Well, feel sorry f
Richard Jelinek:
> thought you might be interested in http://nlp.petamem.com
While we're talking about NLP sites, http://www.fieldmethods.net/ is
well worth a look.
--
"He was a modest, good-humored boy. It was Oxford that made him insufferable."
12 matches
Mail list logo
