On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 06:39:14PM -0500, Joe Schulman wrote: > I have no problem with it and find it extremely interesting. Although I have supreme doubts that this will work, and I also believe that more effort should be spent on the *real* next implementation of the Perl interpreter, Perl 6, than on creating another new one from scratch, if anyone has any questions about how Perl is implemented, feel free to ask me. Simon
- RE: Supercompiled Perl Lee Goddard
- Modern Programming Language Concepts (... Helmut Enck-Radana
- RE: Modern Programming Language C... Lee Goddard
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Valentin Turchin
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Jordan Dimov
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Valentin Turchin
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Jordan Dimov
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Tom Fawcett
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Jordan Dimov
- RE: Supercompiled Perl Joe Schulman
- RE: Supercompiled Perl Simon Cozens
- RE: Supercompiled Perl guinevere liberty
- RE: Supercompiled Perl Tom Fawcett
- Re: Supercompiled Perl John Porter
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Josiah Bryan
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Simon Cozens
- RE: Supercompiled Perl David M Guzak
- RE: Supercompiled Perl guinevere liberty
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Andrei P. Nemytykh
- Re: Supercompiled Perl Gidon Wise