On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 10:43:10AM +, Paul Howarth wrote:
However, the plan envisages third-party repositories sticking with
vendor directories and I'm not sure that's going to happen. If I need a
module for my own repository and Fedora already has some version of it,
I just grab that
On 02/02/2011 11:43 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 31/01/11 15:21, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Hello,
because some questions and blocked reviews [1]. I feel that we really
need discuss our @INC paths once again. I wrote proposal, which is
almost the same as was the one sent to the list few months
On 02/01/2011 05:09 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/31/2011 04:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/31/2011 04:21 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Hello,
because some questions and blocked reviews [1]. I feel that we really
need discuss our @INC paths once again.
Thanks for trying to launch such
On 31/01/11 15:21, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Hello,
because some questions and blocked reviews [1]. I feel that we really
need discuss our @INC paths once again. I wrote proposal, which is
almost the same as was the one sent to the list few months ago [2].
This is only proposal and there are
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
[snip]
I don't really see any great harm in installing modules to perl/core
directories rather than vendor directories. I also like this nice,
simple set of paths.
However, the plan envisages third-party repositories
On 01/31/2011 04:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/31/2011 04:21 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Hello,
because some questions and blocked reviews [1]. I feel that we really
need discuss our @INC paths once again.
Thanks for trying to launch such a discussion.
I am blocking these reviews,
Hello,
because some questions and blocked reviews [1]. I feel that we really
need discuss our @INC paths once again. I wrote proposal, which is
almost the same as was the one sent to the list few months ago [2].
This is only proposal and there are also other possibilities, how to
create specific
On 01/31/2011 04:21 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Hello,
because some questions and blocked reviews [1]. I feel that we really
need discuss our @INC paths once again.
Thanks for trying to launch such a discussion.
I am blocking these reviews, because I feel redhat.cz has drawn
uncommunicated,
* Marcela Mašláňová [31/01/2011 16:57] :
This is only proposal and there are also other possibilities, how to
create specific directory for installation of users rpms. I'd like to
change this proposal to FPC guidelines maybe for next Fedora, therefore
I really like to know your opinions.
