Re: perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta merging into perl-CPAN-Meta

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:57:18AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > Upstream has merged Parse::CPAN::Meta into the CPAN-Meta dist. Normally, I'd > just add appropriate obsoletes/provides, retire perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta and > that would be that. However, the perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta package has an epoch, > whi

Re: perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta merging into perl-CPAN-Meta

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:16:32PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > Good, that's what I was wanting to hear. The other thing that needs doing in > the main perl spec is to merge the perl-Parse-CPAN-Meta bootstrap package > into the perl-CPAN-Meta bootstrap package, so that the packaging is the same > a

Re: Mario Andrade Mendon�a Setor Financeiro (58816)

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:06:26AM +0200, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: > This is a test. The mailing list should not accept e-mails with From: header > pointing to the mailing list. > Even banning the address does not help. I created a Fedora infrastructure bug report

Perl packages with OpenSSL 1.1.0

Hello, as you maybe noticed, Fedora 26 upgraded OpenSSL to 1.1.0b version . This version breaks API and causes many packages to fail to build or to work . I gathered all these failures noticed

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Tiny] PR #3: Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for delivering of HTTPs support

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Add perl-HTTP-Tiny-https package for delivering of HTTPs support` that you are following: `` This patch makes https tests optional in perl-HTTP-Tiny-tests. That goes against current practice we (at least I) have in tests subpackages: We tend to enforce all

[rpms/perl-local-lib] PR #2: Ensure csh syntax is used for C shell even if SHELL env var is unset.

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Ensure csh syntax is used for C shell even if SHELL env var is unset.` that you are following: `` Just a nit pick: If SHELL is not set, Perl local::lib is not fooled into sh syntax. It's a documented feature: * Rather basic shell detection. Right now

[rpms/perl-local-lib] PR #2: Ensure csh syntax is used for C shell even if SHELL env var is unset.

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Ensure csh syntax is used for C shell even if SHELL env var is unset.` that you are following: `` The AVC failure is tracked at . It won't block perl-local-lib because it does not enforce fedora-ci.koji-build.

License of perl metapackage should be LicenseRef-Not-Copyrightable

V Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 07:11:09AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > We added new license LicenseRef-Not-Copyrightable that should be used for > packages like foo-filesystem that e.g., create just directories and does not > have copyrightable code nor content. > I believe all metapackages, i.e. pa

[rpms/perl-Convert-Color] PR #1: Do not depend on files from /usr/share

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Convert-Color` that you are following: `` Do not depend on files from /usr/share `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Convert-Color/pull-request/1 -- ___ p

[rpms/perl-Font-AFM] PR #4: Do not depend on files from /usr/share

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Font-AFM` that you are following: `` Do not depend on files from /usr/share `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Font-AFM/pull-request/4 -- ___ perl-devel

Re: Module needs a non-packaged module, how to?

V Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 02:03:50PM -, Johan Vromans napsal(a): > For the next release of my ChordPro application (fedora package `chordpro`, > CPAN module `App::Music::ChordPro`) it needs a CPAN module that is not > packaged: `JavaScript::QuickJS`. > > How to proceed? I have no intentions to be

[rpms/perl-Task-Catalyst] PR #1: Stop building for 32-bit x86

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Stop building for 32-bit x86` that you are following: `` perl-Task-Catalyst is noarch. What's the point of ExcludeArch? Preventing from building it on i686 builders because perl-Devel-NYTProf requires flamegraph which wont be there? Could you please write

[rpms/perl-Task-Catalyst] PR #1: Stop building for 32-bit x86

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Stop building for 32-bit x86` that you are following: `` Indeed. perl-Devel-NYTProf is fullarch. @jjames, what's the problem with flamegraph? `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Task-Catalyst/pull-request/1 --

[rpms/perl-Task-Catalyst] PR #1: Stop building for 32-bit x86

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Stop building for 32-bit x86` that you are following: `` I see. Could you please mention flamegraph in the commit message? E.g. "Stop building for 32-bit x86 because of flamegraph". `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-

Re: Comp groups

V Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:13:16AM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman napsal(a): > Both of these require a pretty significant overhaul, IMHO. Unless > someone has any objections, I will file a PR on the fedora-comps repo > replacing the contents of the perl group with the following: > > Mandatory Packages: >

[rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random] PR #4: fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional is not supported on non-Rawhide

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random` that you are following: `` fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional is not supported on non-Rawhide `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random/pull-request/4 --

[rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random] PR #5: fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional is not supported on non-Rawhide

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random` that you are following: `` fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional is not supported on non-Rawhide `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random/pull-request/5 --

[rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random] PR #4: fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional is not supported on non-Rawhide

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional is not supported on non-Rawhide `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random/pull-request/

[rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random] PR #5: fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional is not supported on non-Rawhide

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional is not supported on non-Rawhide` that you are following: `` Scratch build does not exhibit gating.yaml :( `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random/pull-reques

[rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random] PR #5: fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional is not supported on non-Rawhide

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional is not supported on non-Rawhide `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random/pull-request/

[rpms/perl-Gtk3] PR #1: BR gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra on F41+ to fix XPM tests

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `BR gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra on F41+ to fix XPM tests` that you are following: `` BuildRequires should not use %{_isa}. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Gtk3/pull-request/1 -- __

[rpms/perl-Gtk3] PR #2: gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra is needed for the packaged tests

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Gtk3` that you are following: `` gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra is needed for the packaged tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Gtk3/pull-request/2 -- __

[rpms/perl-Types-Path-Tiny] PR #1: Explicit paths in %files section

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Types-Path-Tiny` that you are following: `` Explicit paths in %files section `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Types-Path-Tiny/pull-request/1 -- ___ pe

Re: perl: warning: Setting locale failed.

On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 06:02:48PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 05:58:35PM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > * Ralf Corsepius [08/01/2019 17:33] : > > > > > > Adding > > > BuildRequires: glibc-all-langpacks > > > to all the *.specs obviously fixes this issue. However, I doubt

perl-libs-4:5.28.1-430.fc30 is broken

I "fixed" perl in Rawhide yesterday (perl-libs-4:5.28.1-430.fc30) and it causes segfaults in some cases (especially when using Tk). I'm debugging it right now in the hope I will find the cause and the missing changes from blead. If I don't, I will revert the patch till the end of today. -- Petr

Re: perl-libs-4:5.28.1-430.fc30 is broken

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:11:56AM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > I "fixed" perl in Rawhide yesterday (perl-libs-4:5.28.1-430.fc30) and it > causes segfaults in some cases (especially when using Tk). I'm debugging it > right now in the hope I will find the cause and the miss

Re: Review request

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 08:30:00PM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Can a kind soul help with a review? > > Review Request: perl-File-Rsync - Perl module interface to rsync > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678884 > Done. Almost perfect. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP

Making Perl site paths ABI-specific

It was a long time ago I wrote to this list. I'm thinking about changing site paths. Now, perl configures site paths to: /usr/local/lib64/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5 so that anyone installing distributions from CPAN in a system-wide manner will install his modules there. These two paths

Re: Making Perl site paths ABI-specific

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 04:36:38PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > My proposal is make the two paths changing with every new incompatible Perl > release (that happens every year with a new minor Perl version). Example: > > /usr/local/lib64/perl5/5.30 > /usr/local/share/perl5/

Perl modules in EPEL 8

As promised in and on #fedora-perl FreeNode channel, here are some information about packaging Perl code in for EPEL 8. EPEL 8.0 release was announced

[rpms/perl-Time-Duration] PR #1: Rebuilt for RedHat 8 (EPEL8)

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Rebuilt for RedHat 8 (EPEL8)` that you are following: `` There is not need for adding a changelog entry. Moreover, the correct way how to request for EEPL8 builds is to file a bug report into Bugzilla against the package. `` To reply, visit the link below

[rpms/perl-Time-Duration] PR #1: Rebuilt for RedHat 8 (EPEL8)

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Rebuilt for RedHat 8 (EPEL8)` that you are following: `` There is not need for adding a changelog entry. Moreover, the correct way how to request for EPEL8 builds is to file a bug report into Bugzilla against the package. Nevertheless, I requested for the

[rpms/perl-Time-Duration] PR #1: Rebuilt for RedHat 8 (EPEL8)

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Time-Duration` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Rebuilt for RedHat 8 (EPEL8) `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Time-Duration/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel

[rpms/perl-Data-Dumper] PR #1: Use make_build macro

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Data-Dumper` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Use make_build macro `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Data-Dumper/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@

[rpms/perl-Digest-SHA] PR #1: Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Digest-SHA` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Digest-SHA/pull-request/1 ___ pe

[rpms/perl-Digest-SHA] PR #1: Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros` that you are following: `` Next time, please write the NO_PACKLIST=1 and NO_PERLLOCAL=1 together. Also I believe it's a good idea to spell the %make_* macros with parentheses like %{make_build}. I

[rpms/perl-Filter] PR #1: Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Filter` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Filter/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel

[rpms/perl-IPC-SysV] PR #1: Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros` that you are following: `` Thank you for the hint. I pushed my own version because you forgot to add ">= 6.76" constraint to perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker). NO_PERLLOCAL argument is not supported on ea

[rpms/perl-IPC-SysV] PR #1: Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-IPC-SysV` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IPC-SysV/pull-request/1 __

[rpms/perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc] PR #1: Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc/pull-request/1 __

[rpms/perl-Sys-Syslog] PR #1: Spec file cleanups: Use make_build, make_install macros, and use NO_PACKLIST=1

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Sys-Syslog` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Spec file cleanups: Use make_build, make_install macros, and use NO_PACKLIST=1 `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sys-Syslog/pull-request/1 __

[rpms/perl-threads] PR #1: Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-threads` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-threads/pull-request/1 ___ perl-dev

[rpms/perl-Unicode-Collate] PR #1: Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Unicode-Collate` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Unicode-Collate/pull-request/1

Re: %{make_install} and the Perl/Tips wiki

On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 09:08:58AM +0100, Jan Pazdziora wrote: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_parallel_make > and > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl/Tips#ExtUtils::MakeMaker > > and I'd like to clean up some confusion I have. The > > https://

[rpms/perl-FCGI] PR #1: Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-FCGI` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Spec file cleanups: Use make_build and make_install macros `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-FCGI/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mai

Re: Creation of a perl-packagers-sig group

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 10:22:40PM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > A while back, a few of us went through a mad rush to get our packages in > EPEL. This lead to a number of situations where the main maintainer of a > package didn't want to maintain the EPEL8 version of his package and we > had to w

Re: Creation of a perl-packagers-sig group

On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:01:00AM +, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 22:22:40 +0100 > Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > > Hello, folks. > > > > A while back, a few of us went through a mad rush to get our packages > > in EPEL. This lead to a number of situations where the main > > maintai

perl-4:5.30.1-451 split

Hello, Maybe you noticed I added some undeclared dependencies into your packages recently. That's because I finally finished subpackaging Perl modules from perl-interpreter. Now installing perl-interpreter consumes about 9 MB contrasting to 23 MB. Most of the changes are invisible to Perl packagi

Re: perl-4:5.30.1-451 split

On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 03:11:11PM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > That's because I finally finished subpackaging Perl modules from > perl-interpreter. > perl-5.30.1-451.fc33 is now in Fedora 33 build root. -- Petr signature.asc Description:

[rpms/perl] PR #2: Set macros subpackage noarch

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Set macros subpackage noarch` that you are following: `` Thank you for the patch. I will apply it when doing the next perl build. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/2 __

[rpms/perl] PR #2: Set macros subpackage noarch

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Set macros subpackage noarch `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@

[rpms/perl] PR #2: Set macros subpackage noarch

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Set macros subpackage noarch` that you are following: `` This change was implemented in perl-5.30.2-453.fc33. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel

Re: Creation of a perl-packagers-sig group

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:23:03AM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Emmanuel Seyman [12/03/2020 21:03] : > > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8743 > > Does anybody want to be an admin of the group (I'ld rather not be alone > to do this)? Who wants to be a member of the group? >

Re: Creation of a perl-packagers-sig group

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:35:13PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > Could you please subscribe yourself to the list > > ? I could do it myself, but I'd like to > > Done. > You should have received an automated request for confirmating the subscription. Please reply to that chalenge with the same

Re: Creation of a perl-packagers-sig group

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 02:56:44PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:35:13PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > > > Could you please subscribe yourself to the list > > > ? I could do it myself, but I'd like > > > to > > > > Don

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #9: Fix cycle dependencies

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Fix cycle dependencies` that you are following: `` It indeed fix the problem. Just it would be stylistically better to move the block down to an already existing "Optional tests" comment: # Tests only: BuildRequires: perl(Config) BuildRequires: perl

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #9: Fix cycle dependencies

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Fix cycle dependencies` that you are following: `` Better. The best would be move "%end" after "# CPAN::Meta::Prereqs not helpful". `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon/pull-request/9

Re: Review Request: perl-Alien-libmaxminddb and perl-IP-Geolocation-MMDB

V Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 02:40:42PM +0200, Andreas Vögele napsal(a): > I've created review requests for two of my Perl distributions: > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2072968 > Alien::libmaxminddb provides the C library libmaxminddb to other Perl > modules. > > * https://b

[rpms/perl-Dumbbench] PR #2: Add gating

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Dumbbench` that you are following: `` Add gating `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dumbbench/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@li

[rpms/perl-Dumbbench] PR #2: Add gating

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Dumbbench` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Add gating `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dumbbench/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-deve

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Daemon] PR #13: Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0)

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Remove dependency to Module::Build::Tiny (patched by patch0)` that you are following: `` Good catch. One writes so many patches to remove the unwanted dependencies and then he forgets to remove a declaration of the dependency. `` To reply, visit the link b

[rpms/perl-CPAN-FindDependencies] PR #2: Debug gating

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-FindDependencies` that you are following: `` Debug gating `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-FindDependencies/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mai

[rpms/perl-CPAN-FindDependencies] PR #2: Debug gating

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Debug gating` that you are following: `` Applied to rawhide. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-FindDependencies/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@

[rpms/perl-CPAN-FindDependencies] PR #2: Debug gating

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-CPAN-FindDependencies` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Debug gating `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-FindDependencies/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel

[rpms/biber] PR #3: Add an integration test with BibLaTeX

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `biber` that you are following: `` Add an integration test with BibLaTeX `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/biber/pull-request/3 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl

[rpms/biber] PR #3: Add an integration test with BibLaTeX

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Add an integration test with BibLaTeX` that you are following: `` A surprise! I did not expect anybody to merge it. I only wanted to see whether the new test passes before I merge it. Nevertheless, it passed and it's merged now. Exactly what I would do. I

[rpms/perl-Net-Amazon-S3] PR #2: Backport patch to make mutlipart uploads work

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Backport patch to make mutlipart uploads work` that you are following: `` Thanks for the patch. I slightly reworded the changes in spec file and applied to Fedora 39–36 and and EPEL 9. I looked at EPEL 7 and there is Net-Amazon-S3-0.89 which is much differ

[rpms/perl-Net-Amazon-S3] PR #2: Backport patch to make mutlipart uploads work

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-Amazon-S3` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Backport patch to make mutlipart uploads work `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-Amazon-S3/pull-request/2 _

[rpms/perl-Crypt-URandom] PR #1: Test CI with 0.36 code

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-URandom` that you are following: `` Test CI with 0.36 code `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-URandom/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing l

[rpms/perl-Crypt-URandom] PR #1: Test CI with 0.36 code

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Test CI with 0.36 code` that you are following: `` This was a bug perl-POSIX. Fixed in perl-5.36.1-497.fc39. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-URandom/pull-request/1 _

[rpms/perl-Crypt-URandom] PR #1: Test CI with 0.36 code

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Crypt-URandom` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Test CI with 0.36 code `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-URandom/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel maili

[rpms/perl-PPI-PowerToys] PR #1: Update Makefile.PL to not use Module::Install::DSL

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-PPI-PowerToys` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Update Makefile.PL to not use Module::Install::DSL `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPI-PowerToys/pull-request/1

[rpms/perl-PPI-PowerToys] PR #1: Update Makefile.PL to not use Module::Install::DSL

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Update Makefile.PL to not use Module::Install::DSL` that you are following: `` Thanks. I merged it. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PPI-PowerToys/pull-request/1 ___ perl-d

[rpms/perl-FCGI] PR #2: Conditionalize client tests

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Conditionalize client tests` that you are following: `` I applied this, slightly modified, patch. It removes the tests which require FCGI::Client on RHEL. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-FCGI/pull-request/2 ___

[rpms/perl-FCGI] PR #2: Conditionalize client tests

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-FCGI` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Conditionalize client tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-FCGI/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- pe

[rpms/perl-Devel-CheckLib] PR #3: Requires: redhat-rpm-config for tests

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Requires: redhat-rpm-config for tests` that you are following: `` I think the dependency should go to perl-Devel-CheckLib package. Devel::Checklib::_findcc() defaults compiler flags to $Config(cflags). `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedorapr

[rpms/perl-WWW-Mechanize] PR #1: Updated Source0 to the URL that works

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Updated Source0 to the URL that works` that you are following: `` Thanks for the patch. I've merged it. I will modernize the spec file and built it soon. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-WWW-Mechanize/pull-request/1

[rpms/perl-WWW-Mechanize] PR #1: Updated Source0 to the URL that works

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-WWW-Mechanize` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Updated Source0 to the URL that works `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-WWW-Mechanize/pull-request/1 ___ p

Perl 7 in Fedora

Hello packagers, have you noticed an announcement about Perl 7 on a Perl5 Porters list? Saywer X presented an idea that now, when Perl 6 is called Raku, Perl 5 can resume using the higher numbers and that the next Perl wil

[rpms/perl-Digest-MD5] PR #1: Use make macros

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Digest-MD5` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Use make macros `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Digest-MD5/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- pe

[rpms/perl-Digest-MD5] PR #1: Use make macros

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Use make macros` that you are following: `` Thank you for the hint. I did a larger chaneges. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Digest-MD5/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailin

[rpms/perl-MIME-Base64] PR #1: Use make macros

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Use make macros` that you are following: `` Thank you for the hint. I did larger changes. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-MIME-Base64/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing

[rpms/perl-MIME-Base64] PR #1: Use make macros

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-MIME-Base64` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Use make macros `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-MIME-Base64/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Unicode-Normalize] PR #1: Use make macros

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Use make macros` that you are following: `` Thank you for the hint. I did larger changes. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Unicode-Normalize/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel ma

[rpms/perl-Unicode-Normalize] PR #1: Use make macros

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Unicode-Normalize` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Use make macros `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Unicode-Normalize/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mail

[rpms/perl-XML-Parser] PR #1: Use make macros

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Use make macros` that you are following: `` Thank you for the hint. I did larger changes. `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-Parser/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing l

[rpms/perl-XML-Parser] PR #1: Use make macros

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-Parser` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` Use make macros `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-Parser/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- pe

Re: Proposing a new Perl Module Versioning Scheme

On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 07:09:37PM +0200, Tina Müller wrote: > I'm working at SUSE, [...] > As you probably know, the versioning scheme of Perl modules differs from rpm. We have the same issue in Fedora. We had a discussion about it in the past, and the result was that while few packagers wanted t

Re: distro perl's ldflags='... -Wl,-z,relro ...' causing module build errors. bug in distro perl flags? or module code?

On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 05:12:10PM -0700, PGNet Dev wrote: > i'm attempting to build a MaxMind GeopIP2 DB reader perl module > > MaxMind::DB::Reader::XS > > ( https://metacpan.org/pod/MaxMind::DB::Reader::XS > ) > > on Fedora 32. > > > the build fails on F32 with Errors: > >

[rpms/perl-Font-AFM] PR #1: Use NimbusSans-Bold font for afm font metrics testing

ppisar commented on the pull-request: `Use NimbusSans-Bold font for afm font metrics testing` that you are following: `` By force pushing (git push -f)? `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Font-AFM/pull-request/1 _

[rpms/perl-HTML-Format] PR #1: Correct dependencies

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTML-Format` that you are following: `` Correct dependencies `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-Format/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-prefork] PR #1: Correct dependencies

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-prefork` that you are following: `` Correct dependencies `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-prefork/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de

[rpms/perl-Graphics-TIFF] PR #1: fmf

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Graphics-TIFF` that you are following: `` fmf `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Graphics-TIFF/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@l

[rpms/perl-Graphics-TIFF] PR #1: fmf

ppisar closed without merging a pull-request against the project: `perl-Graphics-TIFF` that you are following. Closed pull-request: `` fmf `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Graphics-TIFF/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-dev

[rpms/perl-Graphics-TIFF] PR #2: Add FMF plan

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Graphics-TIFF` that you are following: `` Add FMF plan `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Graphics-TIFF/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- per

[rpms/perl-Graphics-TIFF] PR #2: Add FMF plan

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Graphics-TIFF` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Add FMF plan `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Graphics-TIFF/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@list

[rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601] PR #1: Add tests

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601` that you are following: `` Add tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel ma

[rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601] PR #1: Add tests

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Add tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -

[rpms/perl-Dumbbench] PR #1: test

ppisar opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Dumbbench` that you are following: `` test `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dumbbench/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fe

[rpms/perl-Dumbbench] PR #1: test

ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Dumbbench` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` test `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dumbbench/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >