On 9 November 2010 15:44, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> On 09 Nov 2010 06:02:55 GMT you wrote:
>
>>> For now, I'm sending the complete revision in toto.
>
>> Applied as cf21866, with some tpyo corretcions.
>
> Thanks very muhc. I think it's a better document now,
> even if only marginally.
>
> ==
On 9 November 2010 19:24, Jesse Vincent wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:20:51AM -0700, Tom Christiansen wrote:
>> > Ultimately it's your call, but I think the Cookbook references should
>> > be in there.
>>
>> Thanks, Brian.
>>
>> I still feel that I must recuse myself from making that c
On 3 December 2010 13:49, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after I posted my series of patches to perlipc.pod , I saw that tchrist posted
> his version, which got accepted immediately. As a downside to that, I'll have
> to restart my work. However, I noticed that perlipc.pod still has many
> perce
On 3 December 2010 14:43, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Friday 03 December 2010 15:25:14 demerphq wrote:
>> On 3 December 2010 13:49, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > after I posted my series of patches to perlipc.pod , I saw that tchrist
>>
On 4 December 2010 15:18, Abigail wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 05:08:42PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
>> On Friday 03 December 2010 at 16:53, Leon Timmermans wrote:
>>
>> > We do, honestly. I'm tired of having to explain to newbies why the
>> > official perl documentation is not strict friendly, w
On 4 December 2010 16:29, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> Yves wrote:
>
>> Well, that is not entirely correct. Some /are/ full blown programs.
>
> *Those* I do try to always my() or our() or state() or sometimes
> even local(), which is indeed appropriate in places:
>
> use Carp qw< :DEFAULT cluck >;
On 4 December 2010 17:43, Tom Christiansen wrote:
>> I think we would both agree that that is way to much. And I
>> automatically assume code with "use utf8" in it is subtly
>> broken until proved otherwise anyway. :-)
>
> Oh drat! That's distressing. I some time ago reached the conclusion
> tha
On 5 December 2010 07:54, Naveed Massjouni wrote:
> This thread is really depressing. Personally, I like all of Shlomi's
> suggestions. I can't fathom why bareword global filehandles are still
> pervasive in the perl docs. But instead of the community getting to
> discuss the merits of the chan
On 6 December 2010 19:25, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> This witch-hunt is counter-productive and harmful. You should not
> be offended, or even surprised, if its results are not agreed to.
Tom, using terms like "witch-hunt" is not fair - it implies there is
malice intent on Shlomi's behalf which I
On 6 December 2010 19:01, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi Yves,
>
> On Monday 06 December 2010 10:42:23 demerphq wrote:
>> On 5 December 2010 07:54, Naveed Massjouni wrote:
>> > This thread is really depressing. Personally, I like all of Shlomi's
>> > suggestion
10 matches
Mail list logo
