On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 06:59:25PM +0530, Joshua N Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 06:08:01PM +0200, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> > Hi, with the current release of Event my programs start to fail with
> > this error message:
> >
> >Event: attempt to invoke now() met
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 06:08:01PM +0200, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
> Hi, with the current release of Event my programs start to fail with
> this error message:
>
>Event: attempt to invoke now() method with callback unset on watcher
>'??' at Event/t/00_basic.t line 13
Wow, I must have been
Hi, with the current release of Event my programs start to fail with
this error message:
Event: attempt to invoke now() method with callback unset on watcher
'??' at Event/t/00_basic.t line 13
I do, however, set the callback exactly as specified in the
Event::MakeMaker manpage:
/*
Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
>
> > pretty straightforward and the wrapper is pretty thin. Anybody writing
> > *straightforward* XS would do it pretty much the same way as Inline.
>
> Not necessarily. Inline uses a peculiar style which exposes both entry
> points. For example, it generates code lik
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 09:34:27PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >i wasn't and am not considering performance at any point in this thread.
> >The concern here is whether the C & Perl APIs can match, from the point
> >of view of the naive developer.
>
> And for this match it is an advantage th
>i wasn't and am not considering performance at any point in this thread.
>The concern here is whether the C & Perl APIs can match, from the point
>of view of the naive developer.
And for this match it is an advantage that Inline wraps around the
complete call so that we finally have both the wr
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 11:34:14AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > >
> > > I just read C code produced by Inline and found that - correct me if
> > > I'm wrong - it just builds a wrapper around a C function.
> >
> > Oh! Indeed it does. Hm hm.
>
> I've been avoidi
