Re: semaphores

2000-04-20 Thread Uri Guttman
>>>>> "JNP" == Joshua N Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JNP> It turned out that semaphores were easier than I expected. Now JNP> that I understand them, I'm even more skeptical that they belong JNP> in Event. I'm not saying that I wo

Re: semaphores

2000-04-20 Thread Graham Barr
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 07:53:08AM -0400, Joshua Pritikin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 06:54:00AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Graham, I still have an old non-working pm file in the demo directory > > > that implemented semaphores for Event. > > &

Re: semaphores

2000-04-20 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 06:54:00AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Graham, I still have an old non-working pm file in the demo directory > > that implemented semaphores for Event. > > non-working ? what broke. Everything. I don't think it's been updated s

Re: semaphores

2000-04-19 Thread Graham Barr
t; > > > Since no one replied, I think I'm going to try POSIX semaphores. They > > > > are "newer" and "less complicate" according to Stevens. > > > > > > Oh, wait! Graham wrote IPC::Semaphore way back in 1997... Hm. > > >

Re: semaphores

2000-04-19 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 11:52:28PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 03:51:09PM -0400, Joshua Pritikin wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 03:30:06PM -0400, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > > > Since no one replied, I think I'm going to try POSIX sema

Re: semaphores

2000-04-19 Thread Graham Barr
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 03:51:09PM -0400, Joshua Pritikin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 03:30:06PM -0400, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > > Since no one replied, I think I'm going to try POSIX semaphores. They > > are "newer" and "less complicate" according

Re: semaphores

2000-04-19 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 03:30:06PM -0400, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > Since no one replied, I think I'm going to try POSIX semaphores. They > are "newer" and "less complicate" according to Stevens. Oh, wait! Graham wrote IPC::Semaphore way back in 1997... Hm. -

Re: semaphores

2000-04-19 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 09:42:15AM -0400, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > I am studying Stevens' IPC book. Does anyone know the pros & cons of > SysV vs. POSIX semaphores? I see that POSIX semaphores are "newer" than > SysV. My solaris 2.6 box supports both s

semaphores

2000-04-19 Thread Joshua N Pritikin
I am studying Stevens' IPC book. Does anyone know the pros & cons of SysV vs. POSIX semaphores? I see that POSIX semaphores are "newer" than SysV. My solaris 2.6 box supports both styles. Does linux express a preference? -- "May the best description of competition