* Tels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 Aug 2003 02:21]:
[...]
> > http://testers.astray.com/
[...]
> Hm, it generates fast, but wrong results :-)
> Math::BigInt:
> 1.63 (4 FAILs, 16 PASSes)
Those figures appear to be cumulative. I have no
idea if that is intentional or not.
Otherwise, all looks much
--- Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, it generates fast, but wrong results :-)
>
> Math::BigInt:
[snip]
I have to concur. From HTML::TokeParser::Simple results I conclude two things:
2.1 (3 PASSes)
92430 PASS sun4-solaris
92784 PASS MSWin32-x86-multi-thread
93059 PASS i586-linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Monday 04 August 2003 17:15, Leon Brocard wrote:
> alian sent the following bits through the ether:
> > But there is a serious problem with CPAN test database. There is like
> > 100 000 reports in the CPAN db.
>
> This is not a big problem. 100_000 repo
On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 08:15 AM, Leon Brocard wrote:
This is not a big problem. 100_000 reports is a very small database
and I still don't know why the testers.cpan.org site is so slow. I got
annoyed about it and wrote my own as it wasn't open source. It is much
much faster.
http://search.
alian sent the following bits through the ether:
> But there is a serious problem with CPAN test database. There is like
> 100 000 reports in the CPAN db.
This is not a big problem. 100_000 reports is a very small database
and I still don't know why the testers.cpan.org site is so slow. I got
an
My point is that the CPAN Testers reports for fails have the output of
make test, eg:
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/96865
... but passes don't:
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/96886
This is inconsistent and we're throwing information away. I say put it
in all the tim
