On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:21:48AM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
> That's only 2 months old (according to CPAN) before that it would have
> just failed or passed (failed in this case). Is it in bleadperl? I'd
> be amazed if no one anywhere was using is_deeply with coderefs.
It was undefined, accidenta
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:34:58PM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
> Forgetting philosphical arguments about what's the right thing to do,
> I think the strongest point against this is that there may be people
> out there who expect the current behaviour
The current behavior is to vomit all over the use
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:20:07AM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
> > I'm perfectly happy to punt this problem over to B::Deparse and let them
> > figure it out. As it stands B::Deparse is the best we can do with code
> > refs. What's the alternative?
>
> I'd argue that currently the best you can do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Monday 27 June 2005 00:37, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 12:57:05PM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
> > 1 the refs came from \&somefunc
> > 2 the refs come from evaling strings of code
> > 3 the refs are closures and therefore have some d
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Steve Hay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Aww - I was beginning to like the timer output now the Abe graciously
> fixed Test-Smoke to understand it.
Set HARNESS_TIMER in your environment.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com
Andy Lester wrote:
>I've just uploaded Test::Harness 2.51_02. It turns off the timer by
>default, and adds a --timer switch to prove. Please try it out and see
>if all is well because I'm going to make it 2.52 tomorrow.
>
Aww - I was beginning to like the timer output now the Abe graciously
fi
On 6/27/05, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:41:30AM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote:
> > I'm not sure there is a right way to deparse closures (in general).
> > For example if a variable is shared between 2 closures then it only
> > makes sense to deparse both of
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:08:40AM +0200, David Landgren wrote:
> I ranted a while back about s/got/received/
Yeah, that's a different issue.
--
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
> Has the timer output confused other things besides Test-Smoke that you
> know of? If not then perhaps leave the timer output on by default and
> have a switch to turn it off?
I believe some of Module::Build's tests got confused.
Mayb
Michael G Schwern wrote:
I just went to go patch in the code ref stuff to is_deeply() and found that
I had unfinished changes to the diagnostic output. Remember, it was about
including the description in the failure diagnostics. So instead of this:
/Users/schwern/tmp/test...NOK 1
On 6/26/05, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For 3, it looks like B::Deparse does't handle the data at all so even
> > if the deparsed subs are identical they may behave totally
> > differently.
>
> This will simply have to be a caveat. Fortunately, if B::Deparse ever gets
> this
11 matches
Mail list logo
