On 1/4/07, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/4/07, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 4, 2007, at 11:21 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
>
> >> No. You either have tests that are ordered, or you don't.
> >
> > Stated as if it were some sort of immutable law of the universe!
>
> It
On 1/4/07, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 4, 2007, at 11:21 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
>> No. You either have tests that are ordered, or you don't.
>
> Stated as if it were some sort of immutable law of the universe!
It is as far as Test::Harness goes. Test::Harness doesn't have
On Jan 4, 2007, at 11:21 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
No. You either have tests that are ordered, or you don't.
Stated as if it were some sort of immutable law of the universe!
It is as far as Test::Harness goes. Test::Harness doesn't have any
sort of idea of what connects tests together.
# from Andy Lester
# on Thursday 04 January 2007 06:25 pm:
>On Jan 4, 2007, at 8:17 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
>> Is it possible to shuffle all but the first tests?
>
>No. You either have tests that are ordered, or you don't.
Stated as if it were some sort of immutable law of the universe! My
poi
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 13:34 -0800, Ovid wrote:
> I guess the reason I have never used BAIL_OUT is because if I have a
> bunch of tests failing, they fail quickly and I don't have to wait for
> them :) I suppose it's not that big of a deal, but I noticed it this
> evening and thought I would toss i
* Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-04T16:34:31]
> I guess the reason I have never used BAIL_OUT is because if I have a
> bunch of tests failing, they fail quickly and I don't have to wait for
> them :) I suppose it's not that big of a deal, but I noticed it this
> evening and thought I would toss
On Jan 4, 2007, at 8:17 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# from Ovid
# on Thursday 04 January 2007 01:34 pm:
However, if you use the '-s' switch to shuffle your tests and bailout
is not first, then some tests will run until the BAIL_OUT is hit.
This seems to violate the principle that tests should be
# from Ovid
# on Thursday 04 January 2007 01:34 pm:
>However, if you use the '-s' switch to shuffle your tests and bailout
>is not first, then some tests will run until the BAIL_OUT is hit.
> This seems to violate the principle that tests should be able to run
> in any order without dependencies.
>From the docs:
BAIL_OUT
BAIL_OUT($reason);
Indicates to the harness that things are going so badly all testing
should terminate. This includes the running any additional test
scripts.
This is typically used when testing cannot continue such as a crit-
ical module fail
Whoops. Forgot to send this back to the list.
--- Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 02:52:38 -0800 (PST)
> From: Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: "Really" Test Anything
> To: Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --- Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I
On 2 Jan 2007, at 11:07, Ovid wrote:
[snip]
I'm planning, within the next couple of weeks or so, to release a new
version of TAPx::Parser. Amongst other things, I have two test
harnesses now included with it (one is a subclass of the other which
allows test output to be colorized). Along with th
11 matches
Mail list logo
