* Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-10 08:35]:
> As email continues to get locked down more-heavily, is it worth
> looking into an alternative delivery (possibly even as the
> default) path for CPAN::Reporter?
Isn’t the CPANTS driven off a newsgroup? It should be possible to
use Net::NNTP
My ISP now block all non-authenticated SMTP traffic (as far as I can
tell anyway).
Personally I use an authenticated SMTP server on one of my websebers,
but even the ISP's own servers need it.
As email continues to get locked down more-heavily, is it worth looking
into an alternative deliver
On 09/04/07, Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8 Apr 2007, at 22:41, Fergal Daly wrote:
> Yes I did. If you want your structured (or any) diagnostics to be
> associated correctly and you want to allow forking you have to tag
> each line with test numbers. If forking is deemed not impor
# from Ricardo SIGNES
# on Monday 09 April 2007 05:10 am:
>I need to finish/test/release my PC subclass that looks at
>@PKG::POD_COVERAGE_TRUSTME.
I saw that in rt, but I really think pod is the place for it. Why
clutter the code with variables which are only used by a tool that
reads pod? Is
* Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-09T00:41:47]
> On another note, I hacked together a Pod::Coverage subclass that allows
> "=for podcoverage_private foo_\w+" and "=for podcoverage_trustme bar"
> in your pod. Seems sort of natural to have the pod-reading tool
> reading pod and all that
