* brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-13 21:10]:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David
> Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:53:42PM +0100, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
>
> > and:
> >
> > " Foo::Bar is in distribution AUTHOR/Foo-Bar which also
> > contains Foo::Bar:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David
Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:53:42PM +0100, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> and:
>
> " Foo::Bar is in distribution AUTHOR/Foo-Bar which also contains
> Foo::Bar::Baz, so I only need to declare one of them to get both. "
>
> This
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:53:42PM +0100, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Thomas Klausner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-12 21:10]:
> > The metric will be called prereq_matches_use and shall check if
> > all the modules used in a dist are also listed as a prereq.
> > (prereq is either gatherd directly from M
On 12 Nov 2007, at 17:43, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
[snip]
Perhaps a solution which involves a pre-fork model of
Test::Class would be a little neater. The "test scripts"
would then be sub-sub-processes and the harness just needs
filehandles from each of those.
[snip]
Yeah - that would be ne
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 02:08:41 +0100, Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
> There was already a module that does this, I can't remember it's name,
Maybe B::Prereq and its companion Test::Dependencies.
--
andreas
On 13 Nov 2007, at 04:29, Geoffrey Young wrote:
The metric will be called prereq_matches_use and shall check if
all the
modules used in a dist are also listed as a prereq.
I find this odd.
if I check a prereq for mod_perl (.pm) I know I have the 50 some
modules
that come with a mod_per
