Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:49:32 -0800, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
We would seem to be agreeing. If the goal of the test suite is not to
protect
against spoofing, and if it doesn't accomplish that anyway, why put a
signature check in there?
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Edwardson, Tony wrote:
Anyone written any CPAN modules for which the testing coverage needs to be
improved ?
Oh, yes.
Want someone else to sort this out for you ?
Yes.
Milton Keynes PM want to start working together to contribute to the Perl
development effort and
On Saturday 15 December 2007 01:34:37 Michael G Schwern wrote:
Bt skipped tests don't get run so it's effectively deleted, except a
permanently skipped test sits around cluttering things up. Smells like
commenting out code that maybe someday you might want to use again in the
future.
The uploaded file
TAP-Harness-Archive-0.03.tar.gz
has entered CPAN as
file: $CPAN/authors/id/W/WO/WONKO/TAP-Harness-Archive-0.03.tar.gz
size: 5995 bytes
md5: 5a92a2ae5b43469229a68146703d
The biggest change in this release is the removal of Archive::Builder and
Archive::Extract
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:49:32 -0800, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Asking the wrong question. None of our testsuites is there to protect
against spoof or attacks. That's simply not the goal. Same thing for
00-signature.t
We would seem to be agreeing. If the goal of the
* chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-15 19:10]:
thus every tarball of every distribution should contain
everything necessary to take over maintainership of a module.
It is a reasonable position, really, so long as you don’t stretch
it to absurd lengths. If there is something *unusual*
On Dec 11, 2007, at 12:27 AM, Edwardson, Tony wrote:
Anyone written any CPAN modules for which the testing coverage needs
to be
improved ?
Sure - one that particularly bothers me is Apache2::AuthCookieDBI -
back when I took over maintenance of that module I didn't know how to
test it,
