On Feb 13, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Matisse Enzer wrote:
And of course, in the Java world, it is "Expected/Got" (JUnit wants
the expected value as the first argument to assertions.)
;-)
TestNG (testng.org) reversed the JUnit order, so Java unit test
assert arguments are now the same order as Test
Adrian Howard wrote:
which isn't _too_ shabby, but doesn't help much with things like:
ok_if { Foo->new->answer == 42 };
or
ok_if { $Some_dynamic_var == 42 };
So I don't really think it's worth pursuing.
Well, if we follow the logic of the assert2 author, you're just being SLOPPY
u
Paul Johnson wrote:
> But did we ever get an answer to the original question? I have a
> similar requirement and the answers currently seem to be
>
> 1. Buildbot (which seems to be overkill in my situation)
> 2. Smolder and some scripts
>
> Is that a fair summary?
I'd add a #3 which is B
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 07:51:24AM -0800, Matisse Enzer wrote:
> And of course, in the Java world, it is "Expected/Got" (JUnit wants the
> expected value as the first argument to assertions.)
Which is, of course, the right way round, however you spell "Got".
(Hint: it's "Received".) Haven't we
On Feb 12, 2008, at 1:44 PM, David Landgren wrote:
I wish you'd s/Got/Actual/ or Received. Got must die.
I like Got/Expected - I understood them right away when i first
encountered them, and they seem like "plain english" to me:
"I only got 5 dollars when I expected 10!"
"Expected an arr
On 13 Feb 2008, at 00:10, Michael G Schwern wrote:
[snip]
Data::Dump::Streamer can decompile a code reference, complete with
attached lexicals. But as has been pointed out by Yuval, the real
trick is to show the value of all variables used in the block.
[snip]
Yeah... hadn't considered glo
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:34:44AM -0800, Ovid wrote:
>
> As for "received/expected", I really like it because it reads very
> nicely (the verbs aren't quite the opposite of each other, but I still
> like 'em).
>
Oh, and they line up nicely too, in case you want to do some ascii
formatting:
--- Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Landgren wrote:
> > I wish you'd s/Got/Actual/ or Received. Got must die.
>
> Why's that?
"Got" is the simple past of "to get". Informally it's often used as
the past tense of "to have" -- as in Test::More diagnostics. While
it's not exa
