Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee

2008-10-29 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Philippe Bruhat (BooK) # on Wednesday 29 October 2008 17:06: >> > >has-test-pod and has-test-pod-coverage ones (if you find that any >> > > of  my modules meet those metrics, please file a bug report.) >> > >> > Oh, come on Eric, I'm proud of TP (which is really brian's) and >> > TPC! >> >>

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee

2008-10-29 Thread Philippe Bruhat (BooK)
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:24:50PM -0400, Ricardo SIGNES wrote: > * Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-28T13:03:24] > > >has-test-pod and has-test-pod-coverage ones (if you find that any of my > > >modules meet those metrics, please file a bug report.) > > > > Oh, come on Eric, I'm proud of

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee

2008-10-29 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Salve J Nilsen # on Wednesday 29 October 2008 09:28: >I may have realized something now - that the word "Shame" is a very > strong and heavy-handed word, on the same level as Quisling and > Traitor. I'm not sure it is any heavier than you think it is. > When we say "skam deg!" ("Shame on

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee

2008-10-29 Thread Salve J Nilsen
Rick Fisk said: On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 19:09 +0100, Salve J Nilsen wrote: Yes, I'd like to avoid ad hominem attacks. This is a basic part of making any negative-feedback service into a respectable one. You appear to be contradicting yourself here. There's no need for a hall of shame. As some

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee

2008-10-29 Thread Andy Lester
On Oct 29, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Salve J Nilsen wrote: Would you ever argue that a cancer drug should be discontinued just because "only one in a million" uses it? Yes, if the cost to the community was too high. Damn. You ignored the argument and chose to comment on the side note. Oh well.

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee

2008-10-29 Thread Salve J Nilsen
Andy Lester said: On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:30 AM, Salve J Nilsen wrote: Would you ever argue that a cancer drug should be discontinued just because "only one in a million" uses it? Yes, if the cost to the community was too high. Damn. You ignored the argument and chose to comment on the side n

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee

2008-10-29 Thread Andy Lester
On Oct 29, 2008, at 6:30 AM, Salve J Nilsen wrote: Would you ever argue that a cancer drug should be discontinued just because "only one in a million" uses it? Yes, if the cost to the community was too high. In this case, your one-in-a-million cancer drug is geared towards embarrassing p

Re: Public Humiliation and Kwalitee

2008-10-29 Thread Salve J Nilsen
Andy Lester said: On Oct 28, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Salve J Nilsen wrote: Feel free to suggest a better title. (I won't, because I think there's a motivational value in keeping it as it is. [snip] I have to ask what "motivational value" you see in having a Hall Of Shame under any name. Please d