* Ovid [2009-04-06T10:52:33]
> >
> > I thought it might be nice to give the group a description, but really just
> > diagging a description should be good enough for me. I can wait for TAP 15
> > with preludes, envelopes, and the SWAK marker.
>
> Actually, you do a get description:
>
> plan
- Original Message
> From: Ricardo SIGNES
> * Ovid [2009-04-06T04:35:41]
> > Wondering if anyone's played with nested TAP yet and has any
> > comments/requests/questions? Lot's of people have asked for it, so it would
> > be good to make sure we've got it right before it's pushed out t
* Ovid [2009-04-06T04:35:41]
> Wondering if anyone's played with nested TAP yet and has any
> comments/requests/questions? Lot's of people have asked for it, so it would
> be good to make sure we've got it right before it's pushed out the door.
I've given it a bit of a look-over, and I think it'
I've made another tiny commit to Test::Builder to handle nested TAP with no
tests run. It's the last edge case I can think of. Andy Armstrong's working
on the TAP::Parser to make it a bit more useful with nested TAP.
Wondering if anyone's played with nested TAP yet and has any
comments/reque
