On Jan 26, 1:41 am, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't look around at other interfaces. I was mostly like
> "OMG the test tester is so SIMPLE now with the event system! I'll
> implement it and start using it RIGHT NOW!" I haven't really thought
> it through beyond that.
>
> I'd be *very
- Original Message
> From: Michael G Schwern
> I don't get much response to posts on test-more-users, though I know people
> are subscribed. perl-qa traffic has dropped off quite a bit. I'm wondering
> that if I moved Test::More and Test::Builder2 posts back to perl-qa that
there
Michael G Schwern said:
I don't get much response to posts on test-more-users, though I know people
are subscribed. perl-qa traffic has dropped off quite a bit. I'm wondering
that if I moved Test::More and Test::Builder2 posts back to perl-qa that there
would be more discussion?
Do people not
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 08:20:28AM +1000, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> When I started Test::Builder2 I gave it its own mailing list so it could have
> its own community and not clutter up perl-qa with detailed chatter about
> Test::Builder2 and Test::More development.
>
> I don't get much response t
When I started Test::Builder2 I gave it its own mailing list so it could have
its own community and not clutter up perl-qa with detailed chatter about
Test::Builder2 and Test::More development.
I don't get much response to posts on test-more-users, though I know people
are subscribed. perl-qa tra
