On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Ovid wrote:
> Moving along, the *idea* of a nested TAP is so conceptually simple that if
> the implementing code is struggling with it, perhaps it's a sign that there
> are some design decisions which should be revisited? When I find conceptually
> simple ideas
I'm in Prague all week, so I've been able to read, but not really participate.
Echo chamber alert: I've often seen long discussions on this list ignore the
"real world" (though often for good reason). In this case, it sounds like
there's a consideration of removing a feature from TAP. IMHO this
