On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 11:46:16AM +0200, Christian Walde wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Sep 2013 00:59:11 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> >that work this month, but instead I focussed on reducing the
> >number of times that subroutine was called.
>
> I'm curious, did you do any measurements of how much tha
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:18:30PM -0700, Buddy Burden wrote:
> Paul,
>
> > In accordance with the terms of my grant from TPF this is the monthly
> > report for my work on improving Devel::Cover covering August 2013.
>
> +1, definitely.
Thanks very much. Officially, only my grant managers need
Paul,
> In accordance with the terms of my grant from TPF this is the monthly
> report for my work on improving Devel::Cover covering August 2013.
+1, definitely.
Here's what I'm curious about: I notice that you, and many other grant
recipients (e.g. Nicholas Clark) always provide such detailed
* Paul Johnson [2013-09-02T06:37:20]
> And I'm not really sure what a 50¢ explanation is, so I hope I've
> guessed correctly.
Perfect, thanks!
--
rjbs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 10:53:13PM -0400, Ricardo Signes wrote:
> Can you give me the 50¢ explanation of how to benefit from p5cover? What do I
> run, what else must I do? A link to a README is plenty fine for this answer.
I'm not sure that it makes much sense for people to try to run p5cover
a
On Sun, 01 Sep 2013 01:02:48 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
In accordance with the terms of my grant from TPF this is the monthly
report for my work on improving Devel::Cover covering August 2013.
+1, thanks. :)
On a personal note, I'm annoyed that I didn't test any of the 5.18.1
release candi
On Sun, 01 Sep 2013 01:01:09 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
In accordance with the terms of my grant from TPF this is the monthly
report for my work on improving Devel::Cover covering July 2013.
+1, thanks. :)
--
With regards,
Christian Walde
On Sun, 01 Sep 2013 00:59:11 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
that work this month, but instead I focussed on reducing the number of
times that subroutine was called.
I'm curious, did you do any measurements of how much that gained?
In any case, +1. :)
--
With regards,
Christian Walde
