On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 22:36:45 +0100 (CET), Tels wrote:
>> sub canonpath {
>> return File::Spec->canonpath($_[1]);
>> }
>
>I'd written return File::Spec->canonpath(@_); just in case ;)
That ain't right. You'll get an extra argument in front (the class
name).
Is there a reason for
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:11:41 -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>I've got 5.004_04, 5.004_05, 5.005_03, 5.6.1 and bleadperl installed
>to test against. Should I bother with 5.004? Is anyone *seriously*
>using it still?
MacPerl, until 5.6.1 comes out of beta (it's still in alpha, now). And
perhaps
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 13:09:52 -0400, Adam Turoff wrote:
>Moving away from a paragraph parsed format helped somewhat,
>but that was negated by having sections block-tagged like this
>
> =chapter
> =title Introduction
>
> =section
> =title Why we are here
>
>While that matche
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001 01:07:10 +0100, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>That's a bit harder since the cannonical subclassing...
>
>package Foo;
>@ISA = qw(Bar);
>
>is at run-time... from the point of view of the calling program.
>However, its compile-time to the module.
I'm pretty sure you
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:47:12 +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
>As an active non-smoker, I'd appreciate a different name.
You guys (=plural) are nuts. So much bickering over such a tiny
irrelevant detail.
But anyway, if you want a clear and explicit name, why not
"smoketesters". Nothing to do with to
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000 13:59:52 -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>Consider:
>
>my Dog $spot = Cat->new;
>print $spot->isa('Dog') ? 'Dog' : 'not dog';
>
>Currently, $spot is not a dog. It should probably remain that way.
My gut feeling tells me you shouldn't be allowed to assign a non-Dog to
