Andy Armstrong a...@hexten.net writes:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 09:33, Gabor Szabo wrote:
So now that I am switching reporting to TAP how do I log the raw data?
This is the primary use case for TAP diagnostic
blocks. Unfortunately I don't think any TAP emitter currently
supports TAP diagnostics
- Original Message
From: Michael G Schwern schw...@pobox.com
Gabor Szabo wrote:
I recall that we talked about a possibility to emit yamlish but the last
thing
I remember was the discussion about lower or upper case names...
Was there a progress in that subject ?
tl;dr
Ovid wrote:
Yeah, I can deal with all of this. I think the main thing is that any
YAML diagnostics which accept arbitrary keys added will have to:
a. Reject any key matching /^[[:lower:]]/ (or is /^[a-z]/ really preferred
here?)
The simple ASCII/UTF8 a-z avoids wacky locale issues which
I am trying to switch some home grown test scripts to test scripts
using Test::* modules and TAP.
There is one major issue and I wonder how others deal with it.
The home grown test scripts include raw data in their reports.
e.g. when testing a web services we send an XML and receive another
Gabor Szabo wrote:
How do you deal with similar situation ?
Test::More::Diagnostic lets you output structured YAML with your tests. Not all
of the tools in the chain understand this YAML, but those that don't should
ignore it equally. It's part of the spec (at least loosely) so it will be
- Original Message
From: Michael Peters mpet...@plusthree.com
How do you deal with similar situation ?
Test::More::Diagnostic lets you output structured YAML with your tests. Not
all
of the tools in the chain understand this YAML, but those that don't should
ignore it
On 10 Jun 2009, at 09:33, Gabor Szabo wrote:
So now that I am switching reporting to TAP how do I log the raw data?
This is the primary use case for TAP diagnostic blocks. Unfortunately
I don't think any TAP emitter currently supports TAP diagnostics :)
Test::Harness does process YAML
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:07, Michael Peters wrote:
Gabor Szabo wrote:
How do you deal with similar situation ?
Test::More::Diagnostic lets you output structured YAML with your
tests. Not all of the tools in the chain understand this YAML, but
those that don't should ignore it equally. It's
- Original Message
From: Andy Armstrong a...@hexten.net
Test::More::Diagnostic lets you output structured YAML with your tests. Not
all of the tools in the chain understand this YAML, but those that don't
should
ignore it equally. It's part of the spec (at least loosely) so it
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Andy Armstronga...@hexten.net wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 14:07, Michael Peters wrote:
Gabor Szabo wrote:
How do you deal with similar situation ?
Test::More::Diagnostic lets you output structured YAML with your tests.
Not all of the tools in the chain
Gabor Szabo wrote:
I recall that we talked about a possibility to emit yamlish but the last thing
I remember was the discussion about lower or upper case names...
Was there a progress in that subject ?
I'm not entirely sure it was resolved, but we tend to follow cow-paths through
these
- Original Message
From: Gabor Szabo szab...@gmail.com
I am quite confused and I am not sure what do I really want :-)
I recall that we talked about a possibility to emit yamlish but the last thing
I remember was the discussion about lower or upper case names...
Was there a
Gabor Szabo wrote:
So now that I am switching reporting to TAP how do I log the raw data?
So far I could think only to either create a log file with the raw data or to
print the raw data using diag().
In the former case I lose the single result file advantage and I'll have
to somehow
Andy Armstrong wrote:
On 10 Jun 2009, at 16:12, Ovid wrote:
I can probably make a release that does within a few days if that's
the kind of
thing that Gabor needs.
If we can get buy-in from Schwern, what about forking
https://github.com/schwern/test-more/tree and adding it there? It
would
Gabor Szabo wrote:
I recall that we talked about a possibility to emit yamlish but the last thing
I remember was the discussion about lower or upper case names...
Was there a progress in that subject ?
tl;dr version: Yes, its resolved at least to Ovid and I's satisfaction who
were the two most
Gabor Szabo wrote:
Anyway here is another thing that I found.
The test script fetches a few rows from a database and prints out a
nicely formatted
table of the values using high quality ascii art:
1 | 3 | foo
1 | 7 | bar
I can just print the array holding this using explain
16 matches
Mail list logo
