On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Paul Fenwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think a good solution is to add a new category called "honours". It is an
> honour to have your module packaged by Debian, included in the ActiveState
> distro, or to be used by another CPAN module. For honours, we only
G'day Everyone,
brian d foy wrote:
I'd like to see the metircs that only talk about the quality of the
distribution, and leave everything else alone. If it's something I can
fix by doing something to the distribution itself, measure it. If it's
anything else, leave it out.
Gabor Szabo wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Ricardo SIGNES
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-10T12:27:29]
>> I'd like to see the metircs that only talk about the quality of the
>> distribution, and leave everything else alone. If it's something I can
>> fix by doing some
* brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-10T12:27:29]
> I'd like to see the metircs that only talk about the quality of the
> distribution, and leave everything else alone. If it's something I can
> fix by doing something to the distribution itself, measure it. If it's
> anything else, leave it o
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:27 PM, brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to see the metircs that only talk about the quality of the
> distribution, and leave everything else alone. If it's something I can
> fix by doing something to the distribution itself, measure it. If it's
> anything
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am sending this to both the module-authors list so you can be
> > aware of the new metrics and the perl-qa list as they might
> > have a few words
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sending this to both the module-authors list so you can be
> aware of the new metrics and the perl-qa list as they might
> have a few words as well regarding kwalitee.
First, I have to say that I applaud and appreciate t
Two days ago or so I posted a blog entry about the new CPANTS metrics.
http://szabgab.com/blog/2008/06/1212827982.html
I am glad that already there are some comments about them
even if both chromatic and Andy Lester are well, slightly against them
and even Ovid did not like the Test::NoWarnings
On 4/1/07, Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 31, 2007, at 5:32 PM, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 18:26:26 -0400, Yuval Kogman wrote:
>> uses_version_control sounds more like lacks_manifest_skip_file which
>> should deduct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 31, 2007, at 5:32 PM, Yuval Kogman wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 18:26:26 -0400, Yuval Kogman wrote:
uses_version_control sounds more like lacks_manifest_skip_file which
should deduct kwalitee IMHO.
Hmm... reading into the other metrics, i
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 19:51:09 -0500, Graham Barr wrote:
> Yes look at the date
>
> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 00:14:42 +0200
>
> Seems like a few fell for it though :-)
My excuse is that I'm jetlagged and I barely know what day of the
week it is, let alone what the date is ;-)
It was def. a good
On Sunday 01 April 2007 07:11, ReneeB wrote:
> I dont't use vi(m) or emacs!
There's a kwalitee ding for sure!
-- c
* Thomas Klausner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-01 00:20]:
> Even though I was fighting mail servers today, I managed to put
> some time aside for long-needed CPANTS improvements.
Congrats on being _the_ _only_ _one_ to pull an online April
fool’s prank, all day, that actually managed to lead me as
On Mar 31, 2007, at 21:06, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Maybe so, but how else can CPANTS detect that you use the world's
most
advanced version control system: CVS?
Are you kidding?
Methinks you are not familiar with chromatic's sense of humor. Most
people aren't, though, especially in email. :-)
# from Andy Armstrong
# on Sunday 01 April 2007 07:53 am:
>Agreed. May I propose the additional requirement that the
>documentation contain a lengthy treatise on the benefits of true[1]
>object orientation?
>
>[1] For whichever value of 'true' the author prefers.
Yes, but then it should also
On 1 Apr 2007, at 15:45, Paul Johnson wrote:
uses_oo
Shortcoming: Your code contains conditional statements (if,
unless,
or, ?: and so forth). This indicates that you do not have a firm
grasp of OO principles and probably need to reread the GoF book.
Remedy: Replace all you
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 01:29:59PM +0100, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> I'm going to start using this once I can optimise it. It takes too
> long to run at the moment
>
> sub if_then_else {
> my ($cond, $true, $false) = @_;
> return if_then_else(!$cond, $false, $true);
> }
>
> You pass it a
On 1 Apr 2007, at 15:11, ReneeB wrote:
But everybody has different opinions about "nice_code". And
sometimes companies force their employees to write the code in a
specific layout. I don't like the idea of forcing people to program
in a specific way.
I know all about recursion,
And the ben
Eric Wilhelm schrieb:
I'm looking forward to the source (must just be delayed by PAUSE.) I'm
curious whether the mentions_kwalitee metric has any gaming-prevention.
If I say "reduced kwalitee" in the changelog, does that count for or
against me?
Some of the new metrics can't be satisfie
On 1 Apr 2007, at 10:36, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
I'm looking forward to the source (must just be delayed by PAUSE.)
I'm
curious whether the mentions_kwalitee metric has any gaming-
prevention.
If I say "reduced kwalitee" in the changelog, does that count for or
against me?
I'm going to add the
e
>>> for long-needed CPANTS improvements. (And I really have to thank
>>> the Catalyst/DBIC-guys for their wonderfull tools which made me
>>> finish a big project on time (more on this later...))
>>>
>>> So, the new CPANTS metr
this later...))
So, the new CPANTS metrics are:
* docs_make_sense
* mentions_kwalitee
* uses_version_control
* reuses_code
* uses_recursion
* correct_speling
* nice_code_layout
Some of the new metrics can't be satisfied. I doubt that all dists can
"use&
On Saturday 31 March 2007 21:06, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Sunday 01 April 2007, chromatic wrote:
> > Maybe so, but how else can CPANTS detect that you use the world's most
> > advanced version control system: CVS?
> CVS is not advanced as:
> 1. Microsoft Visual SourceSafe - the only sane choice
On Sunday 01 April 2007, chromatic wrote:
> On Saturday 31 March 2007 15:26, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> > uses_version_control sounds more like lacks_manifest_skip_file which
> > should deduct kwalitee IMHO.
>
> Maybe so, but how else can CPANTS detect that you use the world's most
> advanced version co
a big
project on time (more on this later...))
So, the new CPANTS metrics are:
* docs_make_sense
* mentions_kwalitee
* uses_version_control
* reuses_code
* uses_recursion
* correct_speling
* nice_code_layout
You can find a more detailed description of the metrics and how th
(more on this later...))
So, the new CPANTS metrics are:
* docs_make_sense
* mentions_kwalitee
* uses_version_control
* reuses_code
* uses_recursion
* correct_speling
* nice_code_layout
Some of those are going to be quite challenging to satisy :)
--
Andy Armstrong
On Saturday 31 March 2007 15:26, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> uses_version_control sounds more like lacks_manifest_skip_file which
> should deduct kwalitee IMHO.
Maybe so, but how else can CPANTS detect that you use the world's most
advanced version control system: CVS?
-- c
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 18:26:26 -0400, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> uses_version_control sounds more like lacks_manifest_skip_file which
> should deduct kwalitee IMHO.
Hmm... reading into the other metrics, it seems like you were
kidding. My bad ;-)
--
Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://nothi
uses_version_control sounds more like lacks_manifest_skip_file which
should deduct kwalitee IMHO.
--
Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://nothingmuch.woobling.org 0xEBD27418
pgpsXwQhXSOWB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi!
Even though I was fighting mail servers today, I managed to put some time aside
for long-needed CPANTS improvements. (And I really have to thank the
Catalyst/DBIC-guys for their wonderfull tools which made me finish a big
project on time (more on this later...))
So, the new CPANTS metrics
30 matches
Mail list logo
