Re: RFC: Test::JSON

2005-11-15 Thread Adam Kennedy
Chromatic wrote: On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 12:45 -0800, Ovid wrote: Yes, I can see that. I could actually have dropped Test::Differences eq_or_diff and just used the is_deeply function from Test::More, but when working with large data structures, there's just no comparison between the two. I

Re: RFC: Test::JSON

2005-11-15 Thread chromatic
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 09:22 +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote: The question is, what level of deps is crazy for something that they don't actually need on their computer permanently but only need for 2 seconds to install something of yours. I sleep pretty well at night refusing to support people

RFC: Test::JSON

2005-11-12 Thread Ovid
Hi all, For all of my harping about testing, I've never actually written a test module (though I've submitted patches). I just uploaded my first module, Test::JSON. (JSON is JavaScript Object Notation, http://www.crockford.com/JSON/). As it's not hit the CPAN yet, I've attached a copy.