Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can the cpan-testers please get a dedicated list that is not perl-qa?
>
> It's frustrating that so much of the perl-qa traffic is about CPAN
> Testers, a project that I'm not particularly interested in because
> they are not at all interested in me.
Really
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can the cpan-testers please get a dedicated list that is not perl-qa?
There is one:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If people would take their complaints and brainstorms about CPAN
Testers there first, then it wouldn't clutter perl-qa.
On Sep 2, 2008, at 3:41 PM, David Cantrell wrote:
Can the cpan-testers please get a dedicated list that is not perl-qa?
It's called [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's great. So can this all be taken over there, please?
Thanks,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:p
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 03:17:56PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> Can the cpan-testers please get a dedicated list that is not perl-qa?
It's called [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David Cantrell | Official London Perl Mongers Bad Influence
Blessed are the pessimists, for they test their backups
