Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:07:02AM -0400, Christopher H. Laco
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Why would they stop uploading? How would they, the new uploaders, even
know about CPANTS? It's not like uploaded files automatically
Chromatic wrote:
Maybe the problem is that CPANTS as it exists now measures some metrics
better measured on the developer side, not the installer side. It's
handy to run the POD coverage tests as the developer of a module, but
it's not that interesting for the person installing the module to
chromatic wrote:
Some kwalitee metrics are useful in both places and that's fine. I just
wonder if some of PANTS should be more private.
I think much of the problem could be solved by separating the metrics from
the scoring. If CPANTS just gave the results of various tests so I could
look
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:13:31PM +0300, G?bor Szab? wrote:
On 9/7/05, David Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a) all tests are relevant
b) all tests matter equally (are equally weighted)
c) higher score means higher quality
The scores are available in the database. There's no
--- Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are we worrying about these automated kwalitee tests? What will
happen once we find that DBIx::Wango has only passed 7 of these 23
items on the checklist?
I am not the one to answer this, but I'm curious to know where you are
coming from. Is it:
Andy Lester wrote:
Why are we worrying about these automated kwalitee tests? What will
happen once we find that DBIx::Wango has only passed 7 of these 23 items
on the checklist?
I thought the same thing, until kwalitee turned competative. Now we have
a situation in which a large number
On 6 Sep 2005, at 08:10, Adam Kennedy wrote:
So once you find out DBIx::Wango only passed 7 out of 23, it will
go into the author's average, and if he ever looks presumably the
competative spirit will kick in and he's fix some of the problems
That's assuming that everyone is competitive.
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 05:10:40PM +1000, Adam Kennedy ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
So once you find out DBIx::Wango only passed 7 out of 23, it will go
into the author's average, and if he ever looks presumably the
competative spirit will kick in and he's fix some of the problems
But will
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:12:43AM -0400, Christopher H. Laco ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
If it serves no purpose for you, ignore it and go on
with life; as apposed to spending email list cycles on a
CPANTS-is-bad-why-are-we-doing-this diatribe.
It's not as simple as just ignore it if the
Andy Lester wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:12:43AM -0400, Christopher H. Laco ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
If it serves no purpose for you, ignore it and go on
with life; as apposed to spending email list cycles on a
CPANTS-is-bad-why-are-we-doing-this diatribe.
It's not as simple as
Andy Lester wrote:
Why are we worrying about these automated kwalitee tests? What will
happen once we find that DBIx::Wango has only passed 7 of these 23 items
on the checklist?
I don't have any problem with someone proposing or running these kinds of
automated test. It's helpful
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:07:02AM -0400, Christopher H. Laco ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
Why would they stop uploading? How would they, the new uploaders, even
know about CPANTS? It's not like uploaded files automatically return a
scathing email and an html response page that says your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 09:10, Adam Kennedy wrote:
Andy Lester wrote:
Why are we worrying about these automated kwalitee tests? What will
happen once we find that DBIx::Wango has only passed 7 of these 23
items on the checklist?
I thought
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 09:12 -0400, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
I really don't get why the people (not specifically you) who don't agree
with, don't care for, don't care about CPANTs or more CPANTS tests spend
all this effort going off on why it's such a bad thing and why it
shouldn't be
--- Andy Lester wrote:
But will the author actually care? Will the author even know this
exists? Are you going to send email to Bob and say Hey, Bob, you only
passed 7 of 23 things? What's Bob going to say in return? I see a
couple of options:
Ah, now I see where you are coming from. I
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:31:37AM +1000, Andrew Savige wrote:
flame wars. Best, at least for now, is to simply publish some
kwalitee metrics as an optional aid to enthusiastic CPAN authors.
If they prove good and useful, they will naturally become better known.
Some of my recent
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 05:31 +1000, Andrew Savige wrote:
I feel pushily promoting kwalitee metrics will do more harm than good.
And I agree with chromatic that officially endorsing any particular
kwalitee metric is a mistake that is likely to cause unproductive
flame wars.
It's not that
17 matches
Mail list logo
