On 27 June 2014 11:50, Fergal Daly ferg...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 June 2014 07:18, Ricardo Signes perl...@rjbs.manxome.org wrote:
* David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk [2014-06-26T09:19:00]
I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these days -
and it's distributed with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 6/26/14, 3:18 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
* David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk [2014-06-26T09:19:00]
I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these
days - and it's distributed with Test::Builder, so
incompatibilities should
Upcoming changes are going to break it (in a fairly easy to paper over
way). I am not involved in Perl at all anymore. If someone wanted to
take it on, I'd be quite happy to hand it over.
Details are in
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=96719
F
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 09:47:46PM +0900, Fergal Daly wrote:
Upcoming changes are going to break it (in a fairly easy to paper over
way). I am not involved in Perl at all anymore. If someone wanted to
take it on, I'd be quite happy to hand it over.
Details are in
* David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk [2014-06-26T09:19:00]
I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these days -
and it's distributed with Test::Builder, so incompatibilities should
never* happen.
Test::Tester is really nice and easy to use.
Test::Builder::Tester is awful
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 06:18:35PM -0400, Ricardo Signes wrote:
* David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk [2014-06-26T09:19:00]
I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these days -
and it's distributed with Test::Builder, so incompatibilities should
never* happen.
On 27 June 2014 07:18, Ricardo Signes perl...@rjbs.manxome.org wrote:
* David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk [2014-06-26T09:19:00]
I understand that Test::Builder::Tester is the way to go these days -
and it's distributed with Test::Builder, so incompatibilities should
never* happen.
