One thing that would be helpful would be a way to remove "dead" modules from
CPANTS. For example, my module X11::Fvwm has been superceded by code that is
in the core fvwm distribution (I suspect that it derives from my code, even
though I'm not credited). So I haven't updated it in ages, and I eve
* David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-21 14:55]:
> I think the enjoyment of getting that last extra point for 18
> Kwalitee far outweighs the anguish due to the decline in mean
> Kwalitee when releasing a new module. After all, this decrease
> tends towards zero as the number of your releas
Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
I've found some tuits to spend on CPANTS, so I changed the whole author
rating thing (aka the CPANTS game).
I've split the metrics into core metircs and optional ones. At the
moment, the only optional metric is 'is_prereq'.
I've also changed the kwalitee rating from
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 12:17:02AM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Please note the for the next few hours cpants.perl.org will show
> slightly strange results, as a big reindexing is currently happending.
It's finished by now.
Here's a list of dists failing the new Module::Install metric:
Hi!
I've found some tuits to spend on CPANTS, so I changed the whole author
rating thing (aka the CPANTS game).
I've split the metrics into core metircs and optional ones. At the
moment, the only optional metric is 'is_prereq'.
I've also changed the kwalitee rating from absolut to relative (i.e.
