> -Original Message-
> From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:03 PM
> To: Potozniak, Andrew
> Cc: 'chromatic'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: thinking about variable context for like()
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:23:19PM -0500, Potoz
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:45:31PM +1100, Andrew Savige wrote:
> I think the two environment variables can happily coexist as
> shown in the table below:
>
> PERL_SMOKE PERL_SKIP_LONG_TESTS
> Naive User0 0
> Contrary User 1
> "Michael" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Disabling tests for subjective reasons (they take "too long",
Michael> they don't test critical functionality, etc...) is a slippery
Michael> slope.
But there are clearly tests that are "tip of the iceberg" as a safety
chec
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:17:46AM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> Michael> For that reason I'd agree with Curtis and say that
> Michael> everything is always run by default and users can then elect
> Michael> what to turn off. PERL_SKIP_LONG_TESTS seems like a clear
> Michael> name.
>
> As
