Hi!
Data using the new metric 'has_changelog' is now available from
http://cpants.perl.org
Thanks again to Adam Kennedy, H.Merijn Brand and Smylers for various
suggestions/help with 'has_changelog'.
I've also added suggestions to improve ones kwalitee. For each metric I
wrote up a short 'remedy'
Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
Data using the new metric 'has_changelog' is now available from
http://cpants.perl.org
Ooh! my kwalitee improved :) except other people's kwalitee improved
more than mine :(
Thanks again to Adam Kennedy, H.Merijn Brand and Smylers for various
suggestions/help wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Sunday 18 September 2005 10:29, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Data using the new metric 'has_changelog' is now available from
> http://cpants.perl.org
>
> Thanks again to Adam Kennedy, H.Merijn Brand and Smylers for various
> suggestions/help with 'h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Sunday 18 September 2005 11:48, David Landgren wrote:
> Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Data using the new metric 'has_changelog' is now available from
> > http://cpants.perl.org
>
> Ooh! my kwalitee improved :) except other people's kwalitee imp
--- David Landgren wrote:
> Seriously though, I have a module whose test suite includes Test::Pod
> and Test::Pod::Coverage, except that I use the following construct:
>
> SKIP: {
> skip( 'Test::Pod not installed on this system', 1 )
> unless do {
> eval qq{ use Test::P
Andrew Savige wrote:
I based mine on the Test::Pod::Coverage docs:
use Test::More;
eval "use Test::Pod::Coverage 1.00";
plan skip_all => "Test::Pod::Coverage 1.00 required for testing POD coverage"
if $@;
all_pod_coverage_ok();
and scored the coverage kwalitee point...
Yeah, but I'm loat
David Landgren wrote:
Yeah, but I'm loathe to dedicate two separate test files merely to score
two points of Kwalitee. As it is, I'd just much rather bundle both tests
in a 00_basic.t file along with all the other standard no-brainer tests.
One option is just to forget about the two points of
For all the activity going on with CPANTS, we have nothing on
qa.perl.org that refers to it.
Can someone please write up a paragraph and a link that I can put up
on qa.perl.org's front page?
Thanks,
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
