On 14 Aug 2006, at 21:53, Ovid wrote:
[snip]
If anyone likes this idea, I've been accepted to attend Google's
Automated Testing Conference in London (http://
googleresearch.blogspot.com/2006/04/our-conference-on-automated-
testing.html) and I can see what I can do to recruit people. (I was
On 20 Aug 2006, at 17:13, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
[snip]
* Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-17 09:55]:
You're right it can be a bonus. But to sell that to a group of
people who already have something that works very well, is
already integrated with their IDE, continuous integration
packag
- Original Message
From: Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Of course this issue is nothing to do with any intrinsic property of
> TAP. There's nothing stopping TAP being integrated much more tightly
> - there just needs to be somebody with that itch to scratch.
Except that there ne
On 21 Aug 2006, at 15:48, Ovid wrote:
- Original Message
From: Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Of course this issue is nothing to do with any intrinsic property of
TAP. There's nothing stopping TAP being integrated much more tightly
- there just needs to be somebody with that itch
- Original Message
From: Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Except that there needs to be some movement on TAP again. There
> > was a flurry of enthusiasm, upgrading the perl-qa wiki with plans
> > for TAP::Harness, talks about subsequent versions of TAP, but then
> > it died.
On Aug 21, 2006, at 09:43, Ovid wrote:
If I've spent a lot of time building something that is deemed
unsuitable for the future direction of TAP and the testing
framework, I really don't want to continue working on it. If it
*is* suitable but needs some work, I'd like to know that, too.
I
On Monday 21 August 2006 10:20, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> If I were you, I'd assume that silence was a blessing and push on.
I don't know how this blessing might sound, but I do know how the opposite
sounds, and it's much noisier.
-- c
On 21 Aug 2006, at 17:43, Ovid wrote:
[snip]
If I've spent a lot of time building something that is deemed
unsuitable for the future direction of TAP and the testing
framework, I really don't want to continue working on it.
Is it useful to you?
If it *is* suitable but needs some work, I'
On Monday 21 August 2006 17:48, Ovid wrote:
> - Original Message
> From: Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Of course this issue is nothing to do with any intrinsic property of
> > TAP. There's nothing stopping TAP being integrated much more tightly
> > - there just needs to be somebo
In short, many of the gripes of the Perl community about the known
limitations of our testing framework could be mitigated if can get
momentum on this again. However, OSCON just ended, Schwern has a
new job, Andy has other (good) projects that he's pursuing and work
here has stalled. I
* Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-21 20:30]:
> I've found that I really suck at designing infrastructure
> up-front, and find it much more effective to extract
> infrastructure out of at least semi-working code. That's just
> my kink.
Not just yours; I’m in the same boat. I’m watching
- Original Message
From: Joe McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ovid, I currently need a good TAP parser, and I'm settling on yours
> as *my* standard, anyway. It would seem futile to write yet another
> one when I've got yours to work with. I will certainly put on my user
> hat and star
On 21 Aug 2006, at 19:52, Ovid wrote:
- Original Message
From: Joe McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ovid, I currently need a good TAP parser, and I'm settling on yours
as *my* standard, anyway. It would seem futile to write yet another
one when I've got yours to work with. I will certainl
- Original Message
From: Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'd like to make use of TAPx::Parser in Test::Run. Another thing I'd like to
> do is extract all the non-core functionality from the main Test::Run module
> into plugins. I did not completely forget it, just was busy.
Thanks!
- Original Message
From: Adrian Howard
> Is it useful to you?
It's partially useful to me. It's nice to run tests in one terminal and see
'red' when the test fails. I'd like to wrap a wxPerl or Tk interface on it,
but I have to figure out what's wrong with tprove_color first.
- Original Message
From: Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> A thought just occurred anybody fancy doing a mini hackathon on
> TAPish stuff at YAPC::EU?
Sold! I have some issues I need to work on and TAPx::Parser needs some help,
too. We should also post this to our use.perl jou
On Monday 21 August 2006 21:56, Ovid wrote:
> - Original Message
> From: Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I'd like to make use of TAPx::Parser in Test::Run. Another thing I'd like
> > to do is extract all the non-core functionality from the main Test::Run
> > module into plugins. I di
17 matches
Mail list logo
