Hi all,
Andy Lester sent me an email (which I'm relaying with permission)
saying that he feels the TAPx::Parser distribution is a good candidate
for Test::Harness 3.0.
To see how well this works, Andy Armstrong is now working on
TAPx::Harness::Compatible. All of the Test::Harness tests have been
Obviously, nothing will get renamed to Test::Harness without Andy
Lester's blessing. Further, nothing will simply be 'rushed into
place'
without extensive testing and we want to feel *extremely* comfortable
that we're not going to break anything. We want this to be
*completely* backwards comp
On 20 Jan 2007, at 23:50, Andy Lester wrote:
Obviously, nothing will get renamed to Test::Harness without Andy
Lester's blessing. Further, nohing will simply be 'rushed into
place'
without extensive testing and we want to feel *extremely* comfortable
that we're not going to break anything. W
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 01:12:51PM -0800, Ovid wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Andy Lester sent me an email (which I'm relaying with permission)
> saying that he feels the TAPx::Parser distribution is a good candidate
> for Test::Harness 3.0.
>
> To see how well this works, Andy Armstrong is now working on
--- Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Initially I'm concentrating on Test::Harness itself - implementing
> runtests and execute_tests as thin wrappers around TAPx::Harness et
> al. That's going well but I keep glancing nervously at the pluggable
> Straps mechanism. Straps.pm has th
--- Steve Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The primary feature that we've seen missing in the Perl core is the
> ability
> to run tests in parallel. This would greatly reduce our timelines in
> the
> fix-make-make test cycle that we go through in making changes in the
> core.
Yves was also po
I suspect that some of the stuff in Test::Harness, such as Straps.pm
and Point.pm, would go away. That's a bit of concern for me as
I've no
way of knowing how ubiquitous their use is. I do know that a few
people are overriding straps -- 'prove' even has a switch to let you
override it directl
On 1/20/07, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Obviously, nothing will get renamed to Test::Harness without Andy
Lester's blessing. Further, nothing will simply be 'rushed into place'
without extensive testing and we want to feel *extremely* comfortable
that we're not going to break anything. We w
